Monday, July 6, 2009

Dodd Visits New Emergency Department at Middlesex Hospital




Bright and early Monday morning before hopping a plane back to D.C. to work on health care legislation, Connecticut Senator Christopher Dodd stopped in Middletown for a tour of Middlesex Hospital's new Emergency Department.

Dodd was greeted by Middlesex CEO, Robert Kiely, Dr. Bud McDowell, VP of Clinical Affairs and staff from the Emergency Department. After his tour, Dodd held a brief press conference to talk about his work on new health care legislation.

Dodd was introduced by Tom Swan, executive director of the Connecticut Citizen Action Group. Swan was effusive in his praise of Dodd's effort for a health bill which he described as important and significant.

"I don't know what you've been eating for breakfast," Swan said, turning toward Dodd. "But you're having one helluva year. The bill that Senator Dodd has put forth, on behalf of Senator Kennedy, is a very good, if not excellent piece of legislation. It wouldn't have been done without Senator Dodd's leadership."

Swan praised Dodd's efforts to include provisions for shared responsiblity for small business owners and a public option. He indicated that with his experience trying to get universal health care legislation passed during the Clinton era, his hopes for success during the Obama administration was restrained.

"I thought there was a 50-60% chance of it being passed," he said. "But with the most recent announcements, I think there's an 80% chance of legislation being passed."

Dodd, who, at Kennedy's request, recently took a leadership position on healthcare on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, himself expressed a certain skepticism that health care legislation could pass.

"I thought there was a 50% chance," he said. "I think we have a heightened chance to pass it now. But it's not going to solve every problem."

Dodd also addressed the provisions for shared responsibility, which will require small businesses of over 25 employees to contribute $750 a year for full-time, non-covered employees, and $350 a year for part-time, non-covered employees. He also noted that the much-debated public option is essential to healthcare coverage for all Americans.

"A public option which provides an alternative choice to private insurance is a a safety net for people who don't have a private option," Dodd said.

Dodd ended by noting he has the support of the Obama administration.

"The president said, 'I'm going to prepare to squander every cent of political capital I have to pass health care legislation during my term,'" Dodd noted.

I asked Dodd what he would do to give a voice to individuals, especially less powerful individuals, when lobbying firms are spending $1.4 million a day to represent the needs of powerful healthcare clients, pharaceutical companies and insurance companies.

Dodd did not answer the question directly, but noted that he would give voice to the plight of the uninsured, or underinsured individual, and that he is pushing options which not always popular with the lobbyists, or the groups they represent.

To Swann's comment about Dodd's flurry of activity this year, it should be noted that Dodd is involved in a campaign in which he is being challenged by Republican and Democratic opponents. He is working diligently to win over voters who have been critical of Dodd's involvement in questionable real estate dealings, and his acceptance of campaign donations from large financial firms.

9 comments:

Web Dunce said...

Chris Dodd is the best hope we've got in this state. He is always on the side of the working people. It's interesting that the people who are so quick to bash him can never produce anything of merit to back up their arguments. Whining and moaning about some soundbite you heard on Fox news or read in the comments section of the Courant do not constitute facts. Look at his voting record. Watch him on CSPAN if you can catch him. Learn something!

Anonymous said...

Web "Dunce" is an appropriate name.Apparently, unless the "facts" come from Katie Couric or Matt Lauer you Lefties pull out the laminated "Gee,you must have heard that from Rush", or "Fox News" cards.No, the State-run media is the only "true" media.The Government relies on gullible people like you.
Now Dick Cheney told me Dodd received a sub-prime loan, which isn't that bad except Countrywide was in trouble and was miraculously bailed out by Bank of America which, by happenstance,was a big contributor to Obama, Hillary, and ....guess who? Dodd.
P.S.- I got these FACTS from the Huffington Post, which is even more Left than you are.
How does one purchase a cottage in Ireland for $250,000 and have it appreciate to over $600,000 in two years when the Irish housing market is crashing? Who is John Galt?

Anonymous said...

web he still hasn't released the mortgage documents from countrywide. What is he hiding??

Web Dunce said...

Honestly, I couldn't care less about mortgage papers or appreciating land in Ireland. First, he did release the mortgage documents. It was up to the media to actually read them and make a report and not complain that they couldn't take them home! Would you release free copies of your mortgage documents to a bunch of reporters? I think not. And as far as Ireland goes - I lived there! I know the real estate market there. It makes ours look down right normal! Again, you blather nonsense accusations and hysterical innuendo. John Galt? Oh my God, please just go have a drink and relax!

Middletown Eye (Ed McKeon) said...

In reality, Dodd placed his mortgage papers on a table for a few hours for a selected number of journalists to examine. That is not releasing his mortgage documents. And as a Senator, who is a position to be influenced, he should be held to a higher standard than everyday citizens. So, I would expect him to release those documents without prejudice, and failing that, he gives the impression that there's something to hide. Maybe there is nothing illegal there, but he's played his public relations hand very badly (there's no arguing with that), by appearing to be less than forthcoming.

Anonymous said...

If Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Hamilton and the rest of the bunch were held to a higher standard than the rest of their countrymen and women, we would have never gotten off the ground!

Web Dunce said...

Ed, I have to respectfully disagree with you about Dodd's responsibility to disclose all of his mortgage documents to the public. However, you may want to take a gander at this (sorry about the long URL):
http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/upload/2009/02/us_senator_chris_dodd_releases/refinance2003.pdf

I do however agree that he handled the PR terribly.

That being said, Chris Dodd has been the senator in CT for the better part of my life. I have written to him many times on various subjects and he always takes the time to respond, and not with the pre-written standard cliches we expect from elected officials. He actually addressed my specific concerns. He also took the time to speak at a conference my non-profit employer held last fall. I am by no means a dyed-in-the-wool democrat. Dodd has made decisions and statements that I vehemently disagree with. However, I pains me to read the negative things people say about him that have nothing to do with the job he's doing as senator. If there is a cause for an ethics investigation then there should be one. But to hear some people go off on him with nothing but misguided anger to back up their accusations lends no intelligent contribution to the debate as to whether he is serving the people of CT or not.

Middletown Eye (Ed McKeon) said...

I'm not sure what Washington and Jefferson have to do with it, if you're comparing Dodd to Jefferson and Washington, in the most basic argument, I fail to see the same intellectual, revolutionary courage displayed by our latter-day Senator.

Dodd has done some great work. Is doing some now. I've voted for him several times. None of that can ever be an excuse for his clouding or our perception about his judgment by acting inappropriately (even if not illegally). And the mistake is only exacerbated by a dumbfounding inability to communicate clearly and directly, and to admit a mistake was made.

Middletown Eye (Ed McKeon) said...

I believe the document you referred to was a summary created by Dodd and his attorneys months after journalists requested the original documents. This summary, from this source, is for obvious reasons, not the most reliable.

As for releasing the documents at all, I am an advocate of complete accounting for all potential "income" from a source who may bear some influence over an elected official. Our ethics standards are not high enough, and even at the low current standards, many politicians fail the sniff test.

To say I am disappointed in Dodd is an understatement. I think his handling of this entire situation is sad and suspicious.