Monday, July 6, 2009

Feathers Don't Fly At Council Meeting

Council watchers were waiting for a spirited debate about a revised health ordinance concerning the housing of animals on property in Middletown, but these same Council wonks were disappointed when the ordinance in question was tabled and sent back to committee for study.

But the otherwise routine evening was punctuated by moments of drama, first, as local gadfly Sal Caracoglia was ejected from Council chambers for carrying a protest sign which impugned the reputation of a Council member. Caracoglia later made an impassioned speech, after the Council meeting was adjourned, during the public hearing for items not on the agenda, in which his accusations were amplified with a drama that was as forceful as Lear railing against the storm.

More drama was reserved for a lively exchange about whether the city's Showmobile should be used by groups for events in which all charges are waived. No one on the council could remember a time when the Council voted against waiving of fees. The showmobile is a portable stage on wheels used at outdoor events.

Council member Vinnie Loffredo offered a substitute resolution in which he suggested that the Council should waive no fees, in the upcoming fiscal year, for Showmobile use.

"In light of these difficult times, we should not be expending money we have not accounted for," Loffredo argued.

Public Works director Bill Russo noted that in the last fiscal year the account for the Showmobile ran a $16, 380 deficit due to the waiving of fees.

While several Council members agreed with the tenor and sentiment of Loffredo's resolution, some argued with the need for it when the Council is already charged with the responsibility to waive fees or not.

Council member Phil Pessina expressed the idea that fees should be waived for citywide events but that non-profits who are supporting their organization should pay the fees.

"Through the years we've seen the waiver become the rule as opposed to the exception" Council member Gerry Daley said. "But the fees are inconsequential to the costs when we waive fees for events where we see no benefit to the city. And I'm afraid that supporting this (Loffredo's) resolution would impose costs on some very worthwhile events."

Council member Tom Serra agreed.

"In the last year we had 28 functions where the Showmobile was used and these functions served the public well," Serra said.

Council member James Streeto agreed with Serra that waiver of fees should continue for all events, or for none, but to pick and choose would be "silly." Streeto got off the line of the night in his argument.

"The problem we've encountered is that all the groups that come before us are worthy groups," Streeto said. "People are not coming in here to ask for the Showmobile are not the Reformed Church of Satan. Well, I suppose I just lost the vote of all the Satanists out there."

In the end the replacement resolution to ban waiver of fees was defeated, but the two request to waive fees before the Council, one for the Fellowship Church, and one for Unity Day, were both defeated. Streeto and Serra voted in favor of waiver in both cases.

Another debate centered on the repair of a well at Ron McCutcheon park after a state inspector cited the city for a violation. The well in question had been in operation for a year, and the state required reconstruction of the well-head, which in turn required the re-construction of parking spots, curbs and sidewalks.

The Council also voted for a hike in fees for bulky waste pick-up. The actual fee, estimated at $75, will be set by the Public Works department.

A job freeze, which has already been in place for six months, was extended by the Council for the entirety of the coming fiscal year. The freeze excepts fire, police, dispatch and Water and Sewer Department officials.

The Council also informally honored Police Chief Lynn Baldoni, who will be retiring in a few days, for her years of service in the Police Department. The Council led a standing ovation for Baldoni.

11 comments:

Westlake Drive Middletown resident said...

Many people from Westlake Drive showed up to discuss:

July 6, 2009 Common Council Meeting Petitions, Communications 10L

Residents of the Westlake Drive area have expressed concerns over an area of open space which appears to contain wetlands. This area according to public records appears to have been owned and maintained by the Westlake Association Inc.

The land in question which contains the city constructed and maintained bike trail, lies between Trolley Crossing Condominium Association and Hunters Crossing Apartment complex.

The Westlake Association Inc. appears, according to the Secretary of the State’s website, to have been disbanded many years ago. This leaves the question as to what the city is currently doing to maintain this property.

Thank you in advance for taking the time to address the status of the open space near Westlake Drive.

Thank you City Council for all your time at this meeting for working with us on this on how to enhance our wonderful city.

I don't know why the wonderful comments by both the Westlake area residents and the council's wonderful support is not even mentioned in this post.

Anonymous said...

Where have I been? What is the "Shomobile"?

Anonymous said...

I give Vinnie Lefredo lots of credit for at least putting the issue on the table.

Middletown Eye (Ed McKeon) said...

Apologies to the Westlake folks. It's true enough that they made a presentation. If you don't mind I'll put up an additional post about Westlake.

Anonymous said...

We have enough regulations in Middletown regarding the keeping of livestock. We do not need more! Here's a radical idea...enforce what is currently on the books!

Westlake Bill said...

Thank you Ed.
When you post it I will put it on our blog! We also have a permanent link to the middletowneye!

Madam Nirvana (Molly Salafia) said...

I'd like a resolution to change the name of the "Snowmobile" to what it actually is "Stage Trailer,"for a second there I was really excited the city owned a community snowmobile & citizens could take turns on it.

Anonymous said...

Madam Nirvana,
Point of Order the trailer is called a SHOWMOBILE not snowmobile!
which describes it well, a mobile show trailer.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
James Streeto said...

Waiting for the Westlake Post--this is, I hope, an opportunity, IF we can unify the condo owners AND figure out the proper legal method to put an entity on the other side of the table.

Westlake Drive--its my understanding that technically, the area is private property. This being so, the city has no authority to enter it and clean it up--any more than they can enter my backyard and clean it up.

But I believe there may be some bipartisan support for doing something here. Possibly acquiring the area somehow and turning it into a city park, if the financial aspects of such an endeavor aren't crippling and the funds can be found.

At the moment, there are too many unanswered questions, including the question of how the owner can be restored to viability.

I'd suggest that interested residents try to keep it on the radar screen of both the city government and your condo boards.

Anonymous said...

The Westlake Associaion was the legal entity that was to manage the public areas of the Westlake PRD. Individiual developments (like Trolley Crossing and the other apartment and condo developments and private residential areas like Highlands at Westlake) were supposed to provide annual funding for general property maintenance including the pond.
Those individual developments should check their initial documents because they may have implied liability for the maintenance of "Westlake association" property on a proportional basis in the absence of an overall Westlake Association.
Developer George Achenbach recieved permits from Middletown Planning & Zoning for about 5,000 units in a PRD development all at one time in the 1960s. This would appear to make all Westlake owners responsible for the maintenance of their former Westlake Association property, since in the absence of the Westlake Association they are all still proportional owners. I suggest they hire a lawyer since there may be other equally important issues of maintenance and liability that all property owners in the Westlake development have as long term responsibility. Smartest move would be to recreate the Westlake Associaton to absorb all of these issues as initially intended in the PRD filings with the City of Middletown.