Sunday, September 11, 2011

AROUND THE GARDEN


Last week, with the remains of Hurricane Irene so visible on every block, proper tree pruning was an inevitable topic. As a member of the Middletown Urban Forestry Commission, I have a particular interest in street trees.

For a tree-lover, a walk down many streets is pretty heart-breaking. It’s like going to the animal shelter and realizing you can’t help all those abandoned animals – yet it feels as if you should do something.

Urban foresters all over the country fret about the problems we face: how to have trees as amenities, as climate-improvers, as shields from increasingly hotter summer days. Cars, kids, bikes, paving, salt and – especially – utility wires are the enemies of a healthy tree canopy over our streets and highways.

The U.S. Forest Service has studied the health of street trees and found that their average life span is a little over seven years. That doesn’t mean that most of them die when they turn seven, of course – it’s the early deaths that bring down that average so drastically. Poorly planted, unwatered trees might last only six months, while a properly selected tree planted in an adequate space, pruned occasionally and watered regularly for its first couple of years, might live until it outgrows its welcome.

Since Middletown acquired a Tree Ordinance and a City Forester, street trees have been selected carefully to accommodate wires. In the past twenty years, only a few large-scale plantings have been done, mainly in the downtown area. Dozens of ornamental trees were planted in the North End during a sewer separation project. Many of those small trees are under utility wires, but rarely need to be pruned.

Sadly, these are not trees that provide much shade. The classic image of a New England town always includes large shade trees whose branches arch over the streets and sidewalks. In the last decade or so, a trend has begun for planting “set-back” trees – trees that are planted on lawns rather than close to the road. This achieves many of the objectives of urban tree planting – shade and reduced air pollution, less urban flooding, and beautified neighborhoods. Certainly, cars are less likely to run into them, and utility tree-pruners will have fewer reasons to prune them.

Still, the look is not the same and the trees don’t shade the hot spots – those heat sinks known as asphalt streets. Trees can be traffic calmers, but they must be close to the street to do that.

One solution is to plant large shade trees near the street on the sides that have no wires, and plant either smaller trees or set-back trees on the sides with wires. (Underground wires would be so much better, but there’s not much chance of that in this lifetime!)

This is what the Forest Service says about utility pruning:

While not universally practiced, many utility companies continue the practice of "topping" or "round-over" pruning. This technique describes a method of pruning where cuts are made at arbitrary points on a branch along a uniform plane within the crown. The resulting crown form is artificially uniform following pruning. Unfortunately, topping causes more problems than it solves. Because the tree sprouts grow rapidly, the tree must be pruned frequently.

Two commonly accepted pruning alternatives are "lateral drop crotch pruning," also known as "natural pruning," and "side-pruning." Lateral or natural pruning requires the tree trimmer to pick out the branches growing toward the lines and remove them where they attach to the next lateral limb. Properly placed cuts produce few sprouts and natural growth rates. The next cycle of trimming requires fewer cuts than the topping approach, because the problem branches were removed during the previous cycle and sprout growth has been slower. This method is used both on trees growing beneath or to the side of utility lines.

High Street has some telling examples: on the west side between Church and Washington Streets are some of the saddest-looking maples you will ever see. After years of being assaulted, they have finally admitted defeat: one tree after another has lost its leaves and begun to drop its branches, too.

On the east side, near Church Street, a Princeton elm was planted several years ago by a fraternity. The tree is flourishing, providing a beautiful patch of shade in sharp contrast to the sad maples opposite.

The Princeton elm is still young, but it is an exceptionally well-suited tree for the site. Planted close to the street, it seems impervious to salt spray from plows. Whoever planted the tree installed a small wooden fence to protect it from passing cars and bikes.

A type of American elm, the Princeton is fast-growing, disease-resistant, and native. Like any young tree, it could benefit from some pruning – just enough to keep its branches from crowding, and to raise the canopy so that passersby aren’t whacked in the face.

If you agree with me that Middletown’s quality of life would be improved by the relatively minor cost of planting 200 appropriate street trees in 2012, let’s all talk to the candidates who are currently campaigning for office. I would be happy to hear from both tax-payers and candidates!

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why can't we put the wires underground, at least in the downtown where there is greater population density? The cost calculation should not be based on a per mile figure, but per capita.

Ridge Road Resident said...

I think it's a great idea to ask mayoral candidates to commit to planting more trees in Middletown. Also, I would be interested in any events teaching proper tree pruning, siting, selection - it would be especially relevant after Irene -- many people are probably going to be taking down some trees, education on what to plant in their place and how to maintain trees would be helpful.

Tree Fanatic said...

Thanks -- I'll write more on this subject next week. October and November are great months for planting trees!

Madam Nirvana (Molly Salafia) said...

As a member of the Design Review and Historic Preservation committee ( and now P&Z Candidate) - I always try and encourage and work with new business applicants and those seeking re design approval to commit to providing more greening to their sites. When reviewing the CVS site on EastMain Street, I spoke with owners to try and find a compromise between minimum number of spaces that CVS would need, and planting more trees in exchange for more spaces. It is give and take which is something not everyone realizes and the solutions have to work for everyone involved. Increased greening is not only is aesthetically pleasing, but helps to deal with the heat island effect of having paved parking lots. A personal pet peeve is when large trees are cut that seem healthy and replaced with saplings without logical explanation. However, there is an argument that too thick a foliage canopy over a parking area keeps sunlight from melting ice- so it is all about balance. In general, Middletown could stand to get significantly greener landscapes in its more urban areas. I am pleased with the trimming of the large branches at Spear Park and applaud the citizens who spoke out against the initial idea to cut them down, and the Park & Rec department for working together to remedy the situation. In public spaces, where there is little lighting and site lines to the street are not maintained, it provides a haven for crimes to occur- a definite no-no when it comes to maintaining safe public spaces. Trimming the trees so that the park remained well lit rather than cutting down the trees was the perfect solution; and thats the kind of brain storming I want to see more of, and hope to encourage between the City and citizen activists. I would also like to see incentives for businesses to provide emergency solar lighting- we learned a valuable lesson after Irene weeks ago and after the transformer on Washington Street blew earlier this past spring that without alternative energy lighting, unlit areas make it all too easy for traffic and pedestrian accidents to occur. Tree Fanatic has the right idea that the types of trees planted from the start should be more thoroughly considered by citizens and the City. Although appropriate site plantings are not something P&Z reviews or enforces, when looking at site plan proposals, I recognize that at the very least a two way dialogue is something that needs to be started during the review process to encourage better planning of landscapes by private applicants and on public properties. Some sort of system of positive reinforcement of good landscape practices- is long over due.