Showing posts with label dan drew. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dan drew. Show all posts

Sunday, July 22, 2012

Presenting the Genealogy of Middletown’s Mayor


How does this 1885 Italian record relate to the Mayor of Middletown?


Presenting the Genealogy of Middletown’s Mayor

This picture is one of many documents that Mayor Daniel Drew will see when he attends a presentation about his family history on July 25 at the Godfrey Memorial Library.  Anyone interested in learning about the mayor's genealogy is welcome to come!

            Expert volunteer genealogists from the Godfrey Memorial Library spent more than 40 hours researching Mayor Drew’s genealogy.  In charge of researching Italian records was Barbara Prymas, whose search took her through a variety of documents.  Two beautiful handwritten finds were a marriage record for his great-great grandparents’ marriage and his great-great-great grandfather’s death record, both from the 1880s.     

            Much of this research was done using the Godfrey Library’s impressive collection of genealogical resources.  Founded in 1947 by senior Wesleyan librarian A. Fremont Rider, the Godfrey Library has had over sixty years to amass a massive collection of historical and genealogical materials.  The bulk of the works are concerned with the history of New England Families.  Patrons can browse the library’s collection themselves or request a search to be done by an experienced genealogist for a small fee.  Anyone can subscribe to the library’s digital database, the recently revamped Godfrey Scholar+ program, to access valuable genealogical resources through their computer.

            On July 25 staff at the Godfrey Library will be presenting their findings to Mayor Drew.  You can be here too and learn about Mayor Drew’s genealogy!  Members of the public are welcome to attend the presentation, which will take place at 9:00 AM in the Godfrey Library, located at 134 Newfield Street, Middletown.

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Large Turnout Of City Workers For Mayor's Police Chief Announcement

(Video from Darrell Lucas)

Mayor Dan Drew formally announced that he is nominating Acting Chief William McKenna to be our city's permanent police chief. He made the announcement in a Council Chambers filled to overflowing with Directors, Chiefs, Council members, city employees, and the family of McKenna. All had come to express their enthusiastic support for the nomination.

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Reader Commentary: Children in a Divorce?

A reader commentary submitted by Eye reader Jane Majewski

CHILDREN IN A DIVORCE ?


Watching the leaders of our town debate the responsibility of the budget between the BOE and City feels akin to a child living in divorce proceedings. The two parents divorcing, the Board of Education Administration and the old city leadership have been publicly fighting and blaming the other side in ways that I believe are destructive to the core structure of our educational system in town. Two sides spending almost a million dollars of money that was earmarked for special education without communicating to each other has been described as a married couple not communicating how much each is spending from a bank account and drawing a negative balance.

I get this. I just don't get why. I don't get how leaders on both sides of this issue are able to disagree to a level of non communicating about a million dollars. I don't like showing up at BOE meetings to watch those sides attack each other personally. What ever happened to disagreeing with each other but respecting the other side?

The public sits and watches as two parents divorcing are yelling at each other about finances, about who is to blame for the breakdown of the "marriage". As children (and yes, they're adults but for the sake of the story I call them children) stand at the microphone and also attack people; they're rebuked by the same parents who are doing the same thing to each other.

The public, like children in a divorce, listens to both sides. Many have aligned themselves with the "parent" that they most agree with based on their relationships with each side. I watched the Union leader of the Administration read a heartfelt letter about the wonderful things our administration has done in spite of the bad press as of late. I agree. Our administration and teachers have done some amazing things. Then I watch parents stand and angrily scream out like children having been tossed to the side over issues that are painfully real to their experiences. I agree with them also.

I myself feel like I am tossed in a storm on the sea. Perhaps I would be called the middle child? I am a parent who feels she has unresolved issues with the administration regarding simple safety issues for a child with special needs. I am also a parent of a child who has flourished academically and socially at the hands of wonderful staff in her school. I can see both sides.

What I can't see is why is the divide this toxic? Why are the leaders of our educational system hanging onto "who is right" more than focusing on making the educational system a better one for all involved?

Did I mention that there is a new wife in this story? Yes, the Board of Ed has a new wife, the mayor (symbolically). The step mother and father have made a decision about how to resolve the million dollar problem while the first wife (the old BOE leaders) have not felt like they have a say in the matter.
Dad and his new wife have decided that the old wife was wrong in spending the money and will pay him and his new wife back.

The problem as I see it is this....the money wasn't Dad's, his wife or his ex-wives to spend. The money was given from outside the city and earmarked for special education. So, as the middle child, I have to ask...... "this child support if its for educating our children, why is Dad's new wife getting to spend it?"

Let me interpret. State money to reimburse special ed services came to the town. The town spent it. The BoE spent it. The new leadership has decided that the BOE should not have spent it and will now pay it back. Where will this money come from? Could it be reducing special education supports? Could that have been why DEAL was closed to begin with? Will they cut academic programs? teachers salaries? athletic programs? A million dollars is a lot to pay back even in a payment plan. The children and their teachers will pay the price.

I am thinking that both sides may need intervention much like divorcing parents are required to go through family relations. I think they need someone who is not politically aligned to help them work through their differences in a productive way. Me? I think I'll move to grandma's house until they all figure out what they're doing.........

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Middletown Mother Begins Online Petition: No Confidence in Special Ed. Dept. Admins

Letter submitted to the Eye Editors from a mother of a child receiving special education services in the Middletown Public School system:

To the Editor:

I have created a petition addressed to Mayor Daniel T. Drew, the Common Council and Board of Education members which seeks the terminations of Ann Perzan, Laurie Slade and Mindy Otis of Middletown's Department of Pupil Services and Special Education.

The three administrators have consistently failed the students in this town and their families. They have violated the rights of children with disabilities by not providing them access to services that they need to learn in a non-restrictive environment. They have not included parents in the process of changes that directly impact the children with special needs, their families and the mainstream community.

They have not provided their staff with infrastructure needed to implement learning. They have failed to keep special needs children, their staff and the community safe. The evidence of this is their recent decision to disband the DEAL program housed at Lawrence School and place special needs children into the community without infrastructure to ensure that the children are safe; that the staff are trained properly to deliver services; and that communication and training were conducted to the general population and staffing.

As the leaders of the Special Education Department, this is unacceptable behavior and their actions prove they are not competent in their positions and need to be removed immediately.

We have lost confidence in their ability to provide a nurturing environment that ensures our special needs children are being educated in a safe, legal and least restrictive environment.

Jane Flanders Majewski, Middletown

http://www.change.org/petitions/middletown-connecticut-residents-seek-change



Friday, January 6, 2012

Large Solar Arrays Planned For Middletown

Middletown Mayor Daniel T. Drew and Michael Silvestrini, CEO of Greenskies Renewable Energy, LCC, jointly announce an agreement to locate up to 3 Megawatts of solar photovoltaic generation capacity on city property. The solar facilities will be constructed by Greenskies at no cost to the city. One Megawatt of solar capacity will be located on the capped municipal landfill adjacent to the city’s recycling center. The ground-mounted solar panels will cover about 5 acres and provide electric generation for the nearby Remington Building and other city electrical accounts at a rate of $.06 per kilowatt hour. Currently, the Remington Building pays $.15 per kilowatt hour, so this is clearly a very favorable rate.

Based on output projections by Greenskies, the city will avoid approximately $70,000 in electricity costs for the first year alone, create a significant number of construction jobs and bring in needed tax revenue. In addition, the financial benefit of this agreement will likely increase over the expected 20 year lifespan of the project. The cost of grid-supplied electricity has risen over the past 30 years and is expected to continue to rise; however, the power produced from these sites will remain permanently fixed at 6 cents per kWh.

As Mayor Drew pointed out, “These long term agreements will save city taxpayers millions of dollars over the 20 year term, produce needed tax revenue every year and create a significant number of construction jobs in the near term.”

The attractive financials underlying this agreement stem from the federal economic stimulus package of 2009, as well as recent Connecticut legislation (PA11-80) that allows increased distributed generation for municipalities through “virtual net-metering.” The new law permits excess generation from one site to be credited to other municipal accounts.

Because of the foresight and readiness of Greenskies Renewable Energy, whose headquarters are at 10 Main Street in Middletown, and thanks to expedited action by Mayor Drew, Director of Planning, Conservation and Development, William Warner, and the Common Council, certain federal tax benefits that otherwise would have expired on Dec. 31 were captured. The project will also be eligible to sell zero emission renewable energy credits (known as ZRecs) at a regional auction in March. These beneficial federal and state programs coincide to create an ideal financial situation, as Greenskies Chairman Bob Landino explained to the Common Council at its meeting on Dec. 21.

Middletown taxpayers and a local business will both benefit from this exciting opportunity, said Common Council member Gerry Daley. Council member Phil Pessina mentioned that taking “waste property” where we used to dump our trash and transforming it for an environmentally productive use has been the vision of the Jonah Center for Earth and Art since 2004. Now that vision is becoming a reality. The City of Middletown and Greenskies Renewable Energy, LLC celebrate this agreement as a model public-private partnership that benefits the local economy in an environmentally friendly way.

Monday, November 14, 2011

Inauguration Ceremony


You are cordially invited to the swearing-in ceremony for:

Mayor-Elect Daniel T. Drew
Common Council
City Treasurer
Planning & Zoning
Board of Education
Board of Assessment Appeals

Tuesday, November 15th , 2011 at 7 pm

Woodrow Wilson Middle School, 370 Hunting Hill Avenue, Middletown CT 06457

Reception to follow in the Cafeteria. Light refreshments will be served.

The Public is Invited and Encouraged to Attend

Sunday, November 6, 2011

A Funny Phone Call

This evening, about 7pm, I got a 1-800-phone call. I don't normally answer those calls, and when the answering machine picked up, it was a recorded call from the Dan Drew campaign.

The subject of the call was to accuse Mayor Giuliano of not "standing up to the electric company" like other mayors have done.

Really? There are only so many crews, so much time, and SO many trees and damaged lines to fix. What "standing up" by any mayor is going to change the amount of time it's going to take to put our electric grid back together? Just what can anyone say or do to make it go faster?

I know it has been a frustrating week, but I am so thankful for the men and women that have worked their tails off this week to get things working again. I'm sure it wasn't perfect, and perhaps CL&P might have done something differently to be better prepared. But, I overheard a conversation the other day about a crew that came from Canada and worked in Maine, then New Hampshire, then Massachusetts and then here in Connecticut. They're a long way from home and I have no doubt they've been working as hard as possible over the last week.

Just for comparison's sake, the International Energy Agency estimated in 2009 that 1,441 million people in the world didn't have access to electricity. That's 1.4 billion people, or 20% of the world's population. Even with my generator, which powered my heat, well, fridge, and microwave, and about 1/2 the lights in my house, I did find myself feeling annoyed because I couldn't do laundry. I'm sorry for that, because I know I have far more than the majority of the world has...I wasn't hungry or cold or out in the elements. Even if I had been, I have the resources to just go someplace else that has whatever I was lacking.

Thanksgiving is coming, and it's never too early to be thankful for anything and everything. It's also my daughter's 8th birthday, and when I consider how hard it was to even have her, everything else just fades away.

Here's what I'm thankful for: my family, my home, my friends, and my town. I'm thankful for the way the crazy weather over the last 3 months has allowed me to get to know my neighbors better. I'm also glad for the opportunity to teach my children what hospitality and caring for your neighbors really looks like.

I'm not saying I did it perfectly this week. There were MANY moments I cursed the blasted storm and wished the kids were in school. OK, it was most of the time. I was REALLY annoyed that Halloween was canceled (our neighborhood has underground utilities and young trees, so we didn't have the dangers I know were present elsewhere), but then I got to hear my daughter say that this would be the "healthiest Halloween ever" because only 7 houses on my street were home to give out candy.

I've volunteered with Feed My Starving Children, an organization that packs meals for other organizations to distribute to malnourished children in nearly 70 countries worldwide. Their meal package costs $1.44 cents for 6 children, and for most of these kids, it's their only meal of the day. The 2005 World Bank estimate has 1,345 million people living on less than $1.25 per day. When I look at those numbers, even a few days without power seems a whole lot better than a lifetime of poverty and malnutrition.

So, in the end, I didn't appreciate that phone call at all. I get that campaigns are down to the last minute, but let's focus on what candidates actually have control over, and CL&P's performance isn't one of those things. Let's talk about education in our town, or how the Council, the Mayor, and the BOE don't get along AND spend our tax dollars to do it. Let's talk about accountability and transparency and politics as public service, not as political power-mongering.

See you at the polls on Tuesday morning...

Letter to the Editor: Candidate Dan Drew's Credentials

Disclaimer: Opinion piece: The following is a letter to the Middletown Eye from a Middletown citizen. It does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the writers of the Eye and is a courtesy posting. All responsibility lies solely on the author of the letter and should be read as an opinion piece.

Dear Editors of Middletown Eye & Patch,

My name is Juan Montalvo and I am a member of several City of Middletown Commissions as well as a member of the Middletown Republican Town Committee. First and foremost, I am litigation advisor. As a litigation advisor I took an oath to uphold the law and justly serve my community. It is that dedication that leads me to write this letter. While I am sure critics will claim that this is an attempt to smear the opponent, and sling mud, I believe Middletown citizens deserve to know the true nature of Democratic candidate for mayor Dan Drew.

The facts speak for themselves and the inconsistencies in Mr. Drew’s resume should be brought to light. Although not forthright, it is not uncommon for one to show their best face when writing his or her resume and highlight his accomplishments, however; it is despicable for a person to dramatize those accomplishments to almost the point of fiction to make one seem more qualified for a particular position than is remotely plausible based on facts presented. This over dramatization of achievement to the point of false portrayal of facts is even more despicable when that person is seeking to hold such a highly esteemed public office as that of mayor of a City. Dan Drew presents awards on his resume both published on independent sites and his own website, as individual awards given only to him based on his sole merit without giving credit as those received by an entire organization. In one particular case, Drew credits himself with an award that the organization he was employed by received, but he had nothing to do with. Investigating Mr. Drew’s credentials the information below was found:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Ginger Stanley [mailto:GingerS@vpa.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 9:30 AM
 
Subject: RE: Virginia Press Association Awards

I can confirm that Daniel Drew was among a team of reporters that won a first place award in 2004 for a multi-story series on the armed siege of a middle school. This was a team effort at the newspaper (Potomac News). Second place award in 2003, football stars dies in shooting, sports news coverage was also a team project at the Potomac News. Our search did not turn up anything with his name on it for 2005, although Potomac News won a first place for 'staff' for sports pages but I have no way of confirming that Daniel was a part of this staff award. We do not have any records on the Media General awards, Donna Reed at 804-649-6000 may be able to help you. Hope this helps.

Ginger Stanley, Executive Director

Virginia Press Association

11529 Nuckols Road

Glen Allen, VA 23059

804-521-7575 Phone

804-521-7586 Fax

gingers@vpa.net E-Mail

www.vpa.net www.HeadlineVA.com www.VAPublicNotice.com

And more:

From: Donna Reed, Media General Communications Holdings, LLC,

Sent: October 28, 2011 2:10 PM

Subject: RE: Media General Awards

"These were in-house recognitions that were handed out on a monthly basis at one of the small northern Virginia community newspapers owned by Media General. Mr. Drew was given honorable mention in October 2003 for a local sports story."

Donna Reed

Media General, Inc

Richmond, VA 23219

-----Original Message-----


Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 2:45 PM
To: Ginger Stanley
Cc: Kim Woodward; Caroline Cardwell
Subject: Virginia Press Association Awards

Good afternoon,

I am hoping that you could assist me in some research. A gentleman by the name of Daniel (Dan) T. Drew is running for mayor of our City of Middletown, Connecticut; he is a relative newcomer to our fair city, residing in town less than 5 years, and there is a lot of curiosity about him.

In his bio, he stated that he is the recipient of 3 separate journalistic awards from your organization, and I was hoping that you could confirm information. Since an exhaustive search via the internet has failed to reveal any articles published under his name, I hope you could please shed some light on our search. These are the award years and honors he claims:

Awards and Honors:

* Virginia Press Association, 2005, 1st Place award

* Virginia Press Association, 2004, 2nd Place award

* Virginia Press Association, 2003, 1st Place award

Won several writing awards for reporting on the Washington sniper murders, serial killer John Allen Muhammad's life in jail, the armed siege of a middle school by a teenaged boy, and dozens of murders. Wrote an award winning investigative series about corruption in a county sheriff's office that lead to that official's election loss and indictment.

Additionally, these other honors are listed as well; however an internet search has not even resulted in any information about the awarding entity. Is this anything that you are familiar with?

* Media General Mega Award Honorable Mention, 2003

* Media General Mega Award Honorable Mention, 2003

* Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation, 1998 Harcourt Scholar

Would you please help....? Thank you.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dan Drew appeared on the Bill O’Reiley tv show in 2002 claiming to stand for the First Amendment. However, where was Dan Drew when BOE Chair Ted Radzka pulled the plug literally on the microphone when Ed McKeon was speaking at a public session several months ago? Where was Dan Drew when Councilmen Santangelo, Serra, and Councilwoman Kasper walked out on a member of the public who was addressing the Public Safety Committee during a public session only weeks ago? How is it that such an esteemed award winning investigative journalist, and self-proclaimed free speech advocate, Drew failed Middletown in not doing what he himself has professed as his crowning achievements- finding & exposing the the truth in government and standing up for free speech? How is it that Mr. Drew expects Middletown citizens to believe he was such a fantastical investigative reporter when he in fact was primarily a SPORTS writer & provided occasional coverage of the police blotter at the time that some of these awards were given? Middletown should not want a bystander for a mayor.

It is of my opinion, as they say in the courtroom, that the preponderance of the evidence shows that Dan Drew is not a champion of the truth if he cannot be truthful on his own resume. Dan Drew cannot be a team player in the political arena and bring “transparency & communication” back between the BOE and the City & and the City and the citizens if he cannot be honest about being on a team that received journalistic awards rather than trying stretch the facts to boost his ego and pad his resume. Failure to recognize reality and be honest with one’s self-let alone the public is not a quality Middletown should want in a mayor.

Dan Drew’s Resume: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danieldrew

Sincerely Juan Montalvo, Litigation Advisor & Middletown Republican Town Committee member.

Friday, October 28, 2011

Video from two Mayoral Debates

Darrell Lucas has graciously provided The Eye video from the Mayoral debate that was on Tuesday October 25th at The Barns in the Wesleyan Hills neighborhood. The moderator was civic leader Richard Kamins, President of the Russell Library Board of Trustees.




And as promised after the play-by-play write-up of the Mayoral debate between Democratic challenger Dan Drew and Republican incumbent Sebastian Giuliano that was held at Wesleyan University on October 20th, 2011, here is the video that I was able to capture from that night.

This is not the entire debate, it's the first half or so.

These 5 videos are in a playlist series. To go to the next video, click on the "next" icon, this is in the lower left between the play/pause button and the volume button.




Thursday, October 27, 2011

MAYORAL CANDIDATES VISIT WITH MXCC STUDENTS

The race for Middletown’s next mayor was up close and personal for Middlesex Community College students over the past few weeks. These students, who are taking the American Government course at MxCC, had exclusive visits to their classroom from two of the mayoral candidates, incumbent Mayor Sebastian Giuliano and challenger Middletown Councilman Dan Drew. During the meetings, candidates gave students an insider’s look at running a major political campaign, discussed issues facing the city, and answered students’ questions.

In addition to the 35 students, each meeting was attended by deans, faculty, and members of MILE (Middlesex Institute for Lifelong Education). Candidates were given one hour with the audience, and were able to structure the discussion any way they chose.

The visits were arranged by Tad Lincoln, assistant professor of economics and political science at MxCC. He often invites elected officials or members of past administrations to the classroom to give students a first-hand look at how government really operates.

“The lessons students learn during these visits with candidates are invaluable,” Lincoln said. “Politicians and candidates have information and first-hand accounts of how government works that can’t be taught any other way. I am impressed with how our students interact with all the officials, lobbyists, legislative aides and others who have come to campus over the years – and I think we are developing a reputation as an informed, engaged and challenging audience.”

Founded in 1966, Middlesex Community College (www.mxcc.commnet.edu) is an independent member of the Connecticut Community College System. The school offers more than 50 degree or certificate programs on its main 38-acre campus in Middletown, and at the Meriden Center in downtown Meriden. The college promotes understanding, learning, ethics, and self-discipline by encouraging critical thinking. Current enrollment exceeds 2,950 full and part-time students, and 1,600 continuing education students.

# # #

A Response to 450 Wes Students Registered to Vote by Local Democrats

Information below is an opinion letter, not necessarily the view of the other Eye authors nor the view of the Eye. Responsibility is placed on the author of the opinion piece and is published as a courtesy.

Hello All,
This week the Patch is reporting that over 450 Wes students have been registered by the local Dem's to vote in the local election. YES- participation in government is good and encouraged. WE want students to participate locally. However, the alternative view on this is that these students are not choosing people who necessarily the popular vote of the permanent residents would be choosing. In the late 1980's, Paul Gionfriddo's mayoral campaign made a valiant effort to mass register Wes students. He won that election, ironically "some say" that he was not the 'hometown" favorite of those who own property, live, work, and raise children here. There is no way to measure other than word of mouth at the time and claims by both parties on voter feed back.

I was present when Mayor Giuliano gave a speech to the Wesleyan Republicans saying he encouraged students to participate in local government, if they truly showed concern for citizens here and made educated decisions. He encouraged them to get active in Middletown culture and activities. Alex Levin is running for BOE on the same ticket as me and he is a student at Wesleyan who plans to stay for the long haul and serve if elected.It is of my opinion, not that of my party or that of the Mayor, but my own, that when a particular candidate lines up shuttles to drive students to the polls, & works with only single party organizing the effort ( ie College Democrats & The Local Democratic Town Commitee) not a bipartisan group on campus (Democracy Matters), he is sending the message that he Dan Drew does not believe Middletown residents are educated & smart enough to make decisions about who they want elected for themselves.

These students have also not been educated, from my understanding, to the fact that by changing their permanent address to Middletown, they are now subject to local car tax and possibly state income tax.

A plea to Wesleyan students: Not long ago, I too was a college student in a small City. I have had Wesleyan students and professors as roommates since becoming a home owner right around the corner from campus. I love going to Wesleyan concerts especially Taiko Drumming. Please be careful when you vote; use your head, be kind & keep citizens at the front of your mind rather than party affiliation. Realize your vote may weigh more than you know. There are real families attached to every decision you make.

As many letters during election season are written by the party and signed randomly with a name, I decided to skip that and sign my own name.
Food for thought- Thank you!

Molly Salafia, Assoc, AIA, LEED GA - a really annoyed citizen, and yes (R) candidate for P&Z
and author of the really annoying cartoons people love to hate.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Westfield Residents Association Hosts Meet the Candidates Night


Last night's Westfield Residents Association (WRA) Meet the Candidates Night drew quite a crowd, and most of those individuals were candidates for office in Middletown!

All three mayoral candidates and the three city treasurer candidates had a chance to introduce themselves, as did many candidates from both the Republican and Democratic parties. Interestingly, both parties (as well as the independent candidates) repeatedly mentioned the need for transparency and accountability in public office, yet no one specifically mentioned how that could happen differently given the fact that most of the candidates already hold public office in Middletown. Mayoral challenger Dan Drew pushed hard for the concept of economic growth by targeting specific growth industries (bio-tech and green industries), but he didn't explain how he could offer tax incentives to such businesses AND cut taxes while also fully funding the education budget that has been level funded for the last 4 years (don't forget that level funded actually means a budget cut due to contractual increases in salary or services that force cuts elsewhere).
The three mayoral candidates got into an argument over the purpose of the city's reserve fund. Democratic mayoral candidate Dan Drew explained his view of the Democratic-controlled City Council using reserve funds rather than raising taxes: "I would say that we've been in trouble. How would it have been to have been taxed an additional $11.2 million? We are overtaxing if we're saving more than one month's operating expenses." Mayor Giuliano responded,
The concept that a healthy fund balance is overtaxing...the only people who used to advocate that are somewhat to the right of Russ Limbaugh. You need two months reserve to maintain your bond rating. To improve the rating, you need to grow your reserve balance and it needs to be sustained growth, not a yo-yo. Don't forget that you need to pay bonds back with interest, and right now, Middletown's debt service is $15 million per year - that's 10% of the budget, and you could cut 3 mils right there if you didn't have to service that debt.
Christine Bourne, the independent candidate for mayor and current City Treasurer, stated that Middletown has "barely one month's operating expenses in reserve." She also commented that if Middletown wants to be able to offer loans to attract more businesses to our town, we need to have a healthier reserve account to accomplish that.

Much time was also spent discussing the Senior Center, and whether or not Block Grant funds should have been allocated to support this project. Christine Bourne argued that Middletown citizens should have been able to vote on whether or not to spend the money on the Senior Center as the City's Charter requires voter approval for projects over $750,000. That the Council split the project cost into two and then voted to approve funding for 1/2 the project simply denied Middletown residents project approval they should have had. Dan Drew defended his vote against using Block Funds for the Senior Center, "I think we could have funded the center later on AND given $90,000 worth of funding to other organizations right now. That way we could have done both things - funded the Senior Center in another way AND helped out those organizations that really needed it instead of just putting $90,000 away in a bank account for a year."

Clearly the candidates were ready to debate far into the evening, and time ran out before it got too ugly. It was an informative night, but the limited time made it hard for any one candidate to really answer a question.

Public Service Announcement:

Election Day is November 8, 2011. Please take the time to review the different candidates' positions, and then just vote when Election Day comes. Change in Middletown doesn't come because a candidate does or doesn't get voted into office: change happens because individuals take a moment to get involved, and they exercise their free right to self-determination. Many people in other parts of the world would die for what we have, so don't squander a precious gift, and don't be casual about it! Decide what's important to you, and then support a candidate that will embrace your philosophy. Your vote does matter, and you do have a responsibility to your fellow citizens to participate in the process.
See you at the polls!



Friday, October 21, 2011

Mayoral Debate Play-By-Play


Transparency in the Board of Education (B.O.E.) budget and economic development were the top issues at the Wesleyan Student Assembly sponsored Mayoral Debate Thursday. Christine Bourne, who is running for Mayor as an Independent Party candidate, was invited but was not present to participate in the debate. In opening statements, Dan Drew, the Democrat challenger, mentioned his family and he spoke of having great hope for the future. He spoke of his background as an investigative journalist, stating that he had uncovered political corruption in campaign financing which resulted in an indictment. He thinks that Middletown has a long way to go and that increasing transparency in government will increase efficiency. He believes that Middletown is a beautiful and positive place and that there is more we can do. He said that in his position on the City's Common Council he helped to pass a reduction of the tax mill rate by 3/10. He wants to see a focus on growing our economic base by targeting growth industries like green building, biotechnology and aerospace. He wants to see a refocus on public education. He says that the conflict between the City and the Board of Education has distracted from the ability to concentrate on the schools. He sees a lot of potential and wants to move the City forward.

In his opening statement, incumbent Republican Mayor Sebastian Giulliano talked about how he sees different parts of the Middletown community interacting with each other, and his personal history of having lived in the North End neighborhood on Main Street for much of his childhood, and then on Oak Street not far from Wesleyan University where the debate was held. He mentioned how the presence of Wesleyan had played a huge part in his childhood and plays a huge role in the City. He believes that Middletown is doing well and has a stable tax base. “There is much to do. We are an oasis in the State of Connecticut in that we seem to be doing well where other communities our size are not doing as well. What has done that is a stable tax base, solid public safety planning and good infrastructure.” he said. Though there is more potential. Giuliano concluded his opening statement by saying that with solid public safety, good infrastructure, and good planning and economic development the City is in good shape.

When asked about the relationship between Wesleyan and Middletown, Drew spoke of ideas for the future while Mayor Giuliano reflected more on past history. Drew responded that music has been shown to help students' ability to focus and and that one possibility is to link Wesleyan's Green Street Arts Center in with the public school system to improve mathematics skills and test scores and reading comprehension. He wants to see more effort in getting more small locally owned retail stores downtown where students may find employment or spend money which will improve the local economy. Mayor Giuliano spoke of how there once was a tradition in of local families “adopting” Wesleyan students, providing them home cooked meals and the like, but that in the 1960s during the Vietnam War era those relationships soured somewhat. He sees the relationship between Middletown and Wesleyan building back up again in a different form and he lauded former President Bennett and current President Roth for continuing to reconnect the City and the University. Giuliano says he always sees Wesleyan students every Friday when he is mentoring students at Macdonough School. He says that the connections that Wesleyan students have all over the country and the world can't be quantified but enhance our community, and that Wesleyan and the City have mutually influenced each other's culture and character and that is a very healthy and he wants to see it continue.

Giuliano says that the City's financial health is strong but it could be stronger. He says he grew the city's fund balance up to about 17 or 18 million dollars but in the last few years it has been reduced to as low as it can go without reducing the bond rating. He acknowledges that he has had disagreements with the Common Council, who he says has “dipped into the fund balance a little more than they should probably,” to which Drew responded that Mayor has taken money out of the fund balance just as the Common Council has. The Mayor countered that it was only due to the fact that he had been so successful in raising the fund balance that there were funds available to take, but now it is time to grow that balance back up again. The Mayor stated that the pension fund is fully funded and that is a commitment to the City employees. He said that the Council tends to underproject expenses and overproject revenues, and that in the end the public ends up paying for that. Dan Drew responded that the pension fund was estimated to get a better return for the market than what he thinks it is realistically going to get, and that causes a scenario where the budget looks balanced on paper but that may not be realistic. Giuliano countered that the pension fund is not a part of the City's general fund and it's projected growth does not affect the budget at all. Giuliano spoke of a need to stabilize the tax rate because investors want to see stability and steady growth, and how he has tried to do that but that he does not have the control over the budget. “The budget we get, the mill rate we get is what they [The Common Council] give you.” Drew agreed that the overall financial health of the city is solid, however, he says that taxes have gone up consistently every year except for 2009 when he says that the Common Council lowered the Mayor's proposed tax increase to zero. Drew said that during the Mayor's term in office that the Mayor has proposed tax increases every year and that while it is true that the Mayor does not have the last word on the budget, the Council has always passed budgets with tax rates that are lower than what the Mayor proposed. Drew's ideas are to reduce taxes for seniors and to aggressively recruit businesses in growing industries in order to grow the middle class by bringing good jobs to Middletown.

Asked how to improve Middletown's business climate going forward, Drew presented a vision of targeting growth industries and courting business to locate in Middletown using economic incentives, therefore growing the grand list and creating and economy of scale. Drew says this will address the most important issue which is keeping people employed. Drew expressed the need to capitalize on our strengths to insulate ourselves against the greater economic downturns. Aerospace and aerospace manufacturing, green technology, and biotechnology research are industries that have good paying jobs with good health benefits and will bring a lot of tax revenue into the city and that we need to be extremely aggressive about bringing those types of businesses here, in partnership with the Chamber of Commerce, Wesleyan, and other key players, Drew said. Mayor Giuliano expressed that he is pleased with the Economic Development Director and Chamber of Commerce. He cites Grand List growth and says we have not seen the decline that other towns have, but that we face a problem of competing with other Connecticut communities for Connecticut business, so trying to attract business from outside of the state is going to put us in competition with all the other states that have better business climates. Right now, Giuliano says, we are “raiding other towns” and we need improvement at the State level otherwise we are not going to compete with other states where it s less expensive to operate. Drew says that being in competition with other states is not a reason to avoid trying to court business to come here. He disagrees that Connecticut is too expensive a place to do business and says that a national study was reported within the last year that said that when adjusted for education level and cost of living, Connecticut is actually one of the more affordable environments for doing business. Giuliano concludes in saying that we have a great location near the highways and the river and Wesleyan and its many resources are a huge draw. Drew agrees that these assets should be highlighted, and emphasizes that should be done outside of Connecticut, and not just in-state.

When asked about upcoming civic projects, Mayor Giuliano mentioned only one, the Eckersley Hall Senior Center building project, about which he spoke at length, explaining the process that has led up to the point where we are with the project at the present. Drew spoke of the importance of the future riverfront development and all the possibilities there, as well as the recent vote to join the Mattabessett District which will allow the City to decommission its old waste treatment plant and pave the way for the waterfront development..

On public safety, Drew stated the need for a national search for a police chief, more foot patrol in the North End, work on attaining accreditation for the police department, and increasing the size of the police force with an emphasis on community policing.

Guiliano pointed out that he has added two or three officers to the force every year. He wants the former U.S. Army site on Mile Lane to become a fire training facility but says that would only happen “If the federal government ever gets around to cleaning it up.” He also mentioned a need to search for a new police chief.

It seems that the candidates had different interpretations of a question about how to increase and streamline communications across City departments. Giuliano spoke mostly about technology and said that we need to upgrade and “stop treating I.T. like electronic maintenance people. I.T. needs to be a part of every department and every department needs to be content providers for the intranet site and internet site. We need to come into the 21st century, and right now we are going from the 19th to the 20th.”

Dan Drew had a more fundamental interpretation of the question and said that to increase communication we need to start talking again. Barriers need to be broken down, specifically between the City and the Board of Education, he said. “We need to communicate regularly, not just when there is an issue but also when things are good. It is incumbent on the Mayor as a leader to resolve disagreements amicably so that we don't have to resort to lawyers and court.” To this, Giuliano replied that communication requires two willing parties and that is is difficult to have a dialogue when you are the only willing party. He says that The Board of Education cites CT General Statutes as their reply to anything stated or asked of them. Giuliano called for the majority to respect the minority; saying both the B.O.E. and the Council need to be collegial.

Asked about the City's role in supporting the arts, Drew said that “arts give people the vibrancy of life that they deserve and make us distinctive, as well as feeding into the economic development of the city.” Dan Drew would like to see arts more fully incorporated into the public school curriculum. Giuliano said that every person is an artist and everything can be a work of art. Giuliano said the Chamber of Commerce has recently come to realize that art is an economic generator and that we do a good job already of incorporating arts into the schools. “We need to get back to the artistic twist to utilitarian public assets,” said Giuliano. Dan Drew agrees with this and cites the city of Charleston South Carolina as a place that has done good work with historic preservation in architecture that we can use as an example.

Regarding major initiatives of the next two years, Giuliano drilled in his three top items of public safety, education, and infrastructure. He spoke of relocating the emergency management center to city hall, increasing transparency in education budgets, and maintaining roads and making sure “water gets there and goes away when you flush.”

Giuliano explained that $70 million out of $130 million dollars of the City's budget every year goes to the B.O.E.,and that teachers should not be buying their own supplies, and there should not be gaps left unfilled when teachers retire. “If we focus on public safety, education, and infrastructure, everything else is easier and you've got something to sell.”

Drew countered that the current administration has been hurtful to education. The Mayor's zero proposed increase forced teacher layoffs, he said, and the Mayor initiated a criminal investigation which has not yielded any results or arrests. Drew says that the Mayor claimed $2 Million dollars was missing which turned out to be line item transfers and that these serious charges did damage to the system. “The posture has to turn around from being destructive to being cooperative. To accuse people of being criminals is destructive, it hurts public education and it doesn't help.”

After this portion of the debate was over, the moderator began asking questions submitted by the audience. The first question asked what qualifications a police chief should have and Dan Drew heavily stressed honesty and said the chief must have the respect of the force and a belief in and knowledge of community policing. Drew spoke of his opposition to the appointment of Patrick McMahon as police chief because of the question of McMahon's residency and all the miles that he was putting on his City owned patrol car presumably commuting to Norwich in it. Giuliano had this little gem of a retort, “If Pat McMahon dropped dead tomorrow where would we probate his estate? Middletown.” and called the residency question a “red herring.” He continued to speak at length about McMahon but didn't name any specific characteristics he would like to see in a future police chief.

The next question was asking whether each candidate agrees or disagrees with the state statute that requires B.O.E. funding to be the same or more as the prior year. Giuliano proceeded to talk about the current B.O.E. and how they will give a litany or story about what will happen if the budget is not increased. He said that the law has to be followed and that he would be more comfortable if there was more transparency.

Drew immediately answered the question saying that he does not agree with the state law because it reduces local flexibility and he thinks we should have the option to adjust as we see fit. Public education is not a priority of the current administration, he claimed, evidenced by the lawsuits that have cost the city hundreds of thousands off dollars which he says could have been used for educational needs.

On transparency in the B.O.E. budget, Drew said that the budget is available for anyone to see online and it shows line items. He says that it could have more detail but it is there. Drew said there is no line of communication right now and it shows a failure of leadership, and that communication needs to be increased and maintained. To this Giuliano said that the best way to increase transparency is to elect a B.O.E. that is open to it and he pointed out that all five members who are up for re-election are not running. All eleven candidates at a recent B.O.E. forum talked about line item budgets and leadership. “Some mean what they say and some don't” Giuliano said.

Asked about how to combat hunger, Giuliano talked about the success of the challenge grant program for Amazing Grace Food Pantry, saying that program needs to continue. Giuliano said “This is a compassionate community” that responds to need. Drew mentioned Community Development Block Grants, $90,000 of which was approved for the senior center but he feels should have been used for the food pantry. That use of the funds would have helped seniors more, Drew said.

On community gardens, Dan Drew proclaimed himself a “big fan” and mentioned Erin Street garden and the gardens created by Larry Owens's Middletown United Fathers group. He said that gardens help us use food to share, have less pesticide impact, and reduce carbon footprints from transportation and we should be encouraging that as a City.

Giuliano mentioned Long Lane, the Wesleyan farm, and Councilman David Bauer's interest in using state land to create a farming program in cooperation with the VoAg school, including experimental techniques that are “something worth looking into.” Giuliano says he has great respect for gardeners.

The last question asked was what are the strengths of your opponent. Giuliano seemed to draw attention to Dan Drew's young age by saying Drew's enthusiasm is his strength. He also said that Drew is an “avid leader”, expresses his concepts well, and could be a good motivator. He even said that some day he might make a good Mayor, but not this time around.

Drew said that Giuliano is a good family man and that the health of his family speaks volumes to his character, that he is devoted to Middletown, he means what he says, he has great taste in music, and he is dynamic and well-read. At this point Drew interjected an anecdote about a prior conversation he had with the Mayor about music.

In closing, Drew spoke of the pressing challenges the City faces and the need for new solutions, and he said that the challenges we have now are a product of the recent approach that does not work. “We can conduct City business without conflict.” he said. He wants to make the city more affordable, and focus on the attributes and strengths we have to insulate us from problems that the state and nation are facing.

In Giulano's conclusion, he said Middletown has continued to prosper and has done better than other towns, and that he is proud to lead all the people that have made that happen. Sometimes that means getting out pf people's way, he says, adding that the Common Council and B.O.E. have been under Democratic control for 18 years and 46 years, respectively, and that he's only been Mayor for 6 years.

Having reported all that, if you're still reading this, click here to read a quick log of what really happened at the debate that night:.

Monday, October 17, 2011

What Happens in College...Stays in College?

The Middletown Press reported on a story about mayoral candidate Dan Drew's involvement in a Howard Stern-like "gross out humor" program while he was a college student at UConn.

Here is the link to the 2002 Fox News O'Reilly Factor program in which Dan Drew was interviewed defending the right to free speech.

This information is being presented judgement-free. Readers should make their own decision about whether or not what happens in college should stay in college.


Thursday, September 29, 2011

Building Trades Council Endorses Dan Drew for Mayor

The below is a press release from the Dan Drew for Mayor campaign and it is being published as-is without any edits or commentary. It does not represent the opinions of or any endorsement from the Middletown Eye news blog or any writers who contribute to this blog.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 26, 2011

CONTACT: Geoff Luxenberg (860) 335-2023


Building Trades Council Endorses Dan Drew for Mayor

Throws support behind Democratic Candidate and Common Council Slate


The Greater Hartford/New Britain Building Trades Council, a coalition of unions representing Connecticut construction workers with many members who live in Middletown, has unanimously endorsed Dan Drew for Mayor of Middletown and the entire slate of Democratic candidates for Common Council.


“As Mayor, I will work every day to make life easier for the middle class,” Drew said. “I’m committed to getting people back to work by improving our infrastructure, which will in turn, reduce the tax burden.”

“Dan Drew and the Democratic Common Council candidates are friends of organized labor,” said Ed Reilly, president of the Building Trades Council and business manager of Ironworkers Local 15. “They will continue their efforts going forward to ensure that organized labor issues are a priority.”

Dan Drew has also been endorsed by Governor Dannel P. Malloy, former Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz, the Working Families Party, the Connecticut Citizen Action Group, SEIU Locals 511 and 506, SEIU 32BJ, Operating Engineers 478, Carpenters Local 24, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 777, the Central Connecticut Labor Council, and CWA Local 1298.


The Democratic Common Council slate includes:

Todd G. Berch, a member of the Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 777;

Mary Bartolotta, a local businesswoman;

Hope Kasper, a former Middletown municipal labor leader;

Tom Serra, a 30-year member of Carpenter Local 24 and a member for 33 years of both American Federation of Adminstrators Local 61 AFL-CIO and American Federation of Teachers;

Bob Santangelo, a member of SEIU District 1199;

Gerald Daley, a state HR administrator;

Grady Faulkner, a forensic accountant; and Ron Klattenberg, a retired utility executive.


To learn more about Drew and his campaign for mayor, please visit www.drew2011.com.


The above is a press release from the Dan Drew for Mayor campaign and it is being published as-is without any edits or commentary. It does not represent the opinions of or any endorsement from the Middletown Eye news blog or any writers who contribute to this blog.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Scarrozzo blasts The Press

Commentary below is a letter of opinion authored by Chairman of the Middletown Republican Town Committee Matt Scarrozzo. It is his opinion only, and does not represent the opinion of The Middletown Eye news blog, the poster of this letter, or any other contributors of the Middletown Eye blog.

As chairman of the Middletown Republican Town Committee (MTC) in response to the letter Ms. Sundqvist published as an editorial [in the Middletown Press] on September 22, 2011. It essentially accused our current Mayor Sebastian Giuliano of misconduct by supporting Christine Bourne’s primary bid and endorsing Dan Drew as Middletown Press’s candidate for Mayor. Now that the primary is over, I cannot let the rumors that the Press is presenting as truths about the Republican candidates go unchallenged. No reference in the editorial did it state, if in fact it was the opinion of the Press or just Editor Viktoria Sundvist’s personal opinion that alleges such wrong doing by Mayor Giuliano. I must point out to the public that the endorsement written by Sundvist stated no reasons for why the Press was endorsing Drew or state for the public’s knowledge what exactly is his platform, no where was there an outline of his platforms printed by Sundqvist.

Dan Drew states his platform if for job creation, tax reduction and improving education. No where have we read what business Mr. Drew claims he owns in Middletown. If the Middletown Press is whole-heartedly endorsing this candidate, why were these key points not outlined in the endorsement? We need to remember that the Democratic Party at this time has the majority on the Common Council that sets the budget; if the budget is too high; this is a direct result of the work of the democratically controlled Council. It was noted in the Press’s endorsement that Ms. Bourne and the city have lawsuits against the BOE but at the same time, it is not mentioned that the BOE is also suing the City of Middletown. Let’s not forget who initiated the very first lawsuit , the Board of Education filed it against the City of Middletown.

This endorsement lacks any journalistic motivation on the part of the Press and head editor Ms. Sundqvist to provide real facts to the public. Ms. Sundvist’s only accomplishment with this piece of fictitious writing is that she has proven herself adept at trolling Facebook and plucking comments out of context at whim. Sundqvist insinuates about scandalous friendships between opposing party professionals, private citizens, and city employees as well as their kin because of handshakes, smiles or tidbits of candor on Facebook and turn it into fodder to fire at those who disagree with her golden calf, Dan Drew. Where is it in the City charter that states once elected, these officials would have to remove themselves from friendships and kin that they have know prior to the election if they are not in the same party . I could insinuate a lot about Sundqvist from her blind devotion and biased writing and her relationship with the Democrats, but I will not. The sad part is that Ms. Sundqvist could have corroborated her story with simple phone calls to verify facts; however, adding to the surmounting evidence that the Press does sloppy and biased journalism that they are selling to the public as fair and balanced news, as many MRTC members have fund, it’s very difficult to get coverage from that Press that requires even minimal effort and writing ability. The Press has a decidedly biased view of politics in Middletown and the public should be aware when reading the Press that they are reading only one side of the story. The “Middletown reporter” for the “Middletown” Press is always on vacation. A rename of the “Occasionally Half of Middletown Press is in order.

It is noticeable to everyone that reporters from the Middletown Press only sporadically attend public meetings, stay for the first ten minutes and the misquote a few people of their choosing and head for the door. Where was the Press Reporter when Chairman Raczka called for a recess and then pulled the TV feed on Ed McKeon while he was speaking at the BOE meeting a week ago? Drew’s endorsement by Working Families stayed up for 5 days on the Press’s website, yet in that time I know for a fact that MRTC members sent letters to the Editor about issues concerning them and none were published or even acknowledge. Council 4 AFSCME endorsed Mayor Giuliano and this received no front page coverage. The MRTC has found that often in the comment section of the online version of the Press, although comments are supposedly “screened”, sexist and derogatory comments against citizen members particularly those opposing the Democratic view allowed to remain for hours. If there is a time gab between when comments are sent for “approval” and posted, why then should the Press allow these vicious comments even for a second?

Want to know some truths about our Mayor you will never read about in our local paper that carries our city’s name. Here are some of what has been accomplished under Giuliano’s administration because of HIS leadership.

  • moving forward on joining the Mattabassett District which will open our riverfront. The possibilities will be endless.

  • the finishing of the state of the art High School.

  • the army training center on industrial park road; best use of that parcel and managed to keep some park space.

  • the expansion of the community health center and an anchor to the Northend

  • the Mellili parking lot expansion and upgrading

  • building a new senior & community center for our seniors.

Bottom line, the public needs to know that when they read the Middletown Press,

are reading one view point, one that which patronizes the local Democrats and rarely bothers to even shed light on views that differ from this. Print subscriptions should be discounted by 50% because the Press, led by Ms. Sundqvist is selling half-truths as news. An editorial is protected under freedom of speech; however an editorial written with lies and allegations is slanderous, and misleading to those who rely on journalists to be accurate. Ms. Sundqvist is allowed her opinion, as I am mine, however we as a community should expect a higher level of journalism from those in the profession. If the Press wants to be biased, fine, just call it a tabloid or novella, and stop misleading the community into thinking they are reading and purchasing a newspaper.

I encourage everyone who wants to hear the many view points of Middletown and get accurately quoted and researched news to read the Middletown Eye Blog, The Middletown Patch, or the Hartford Courant, and skip the Middletown Press and its so called professionalism.

If this letter to the same Editor I am criticizing even makes it to print, it is a step in admitting there is a problem with the Press and that’s at least a start. To find out more about viewpoints and accomplishments of all the MRTC endorsed candidates see our website or come by headquarters and meet us, we are here to serve.

Sincerely, Matt Scarrozzo

Chairman, Middletown Republican Town Committee

Commentary above is a letter of opinion authored by Chairman of the Middletown Republican Town Committee Matt Scarrozzo. It is his opinion only, and does not represent the opinion of The Middletown Eye news blog, the poster of this letter, or any other contributors of the Middletown Eye blog.