Thursday, January 10, 2013
Board of Ed Introduces New Hybrid Bus
In District Highlights, Principal Joe Cassela shared some of the many exciting components of Woodrow Wilson Middle School. Calling WWMS "Middletown's best kept secret," Cassela told the board that he has high expectations for himself and the students, and that these expectations are increasing behavioral and academic performance. The Drill Team performed for the BOE, students spoke of a commitment to community service and academics, and staff members explained anti-bullying efforts (the Pride Patrol) and other programs. Board members were treated to oatmeal raisin cookies baked by Mrs. Harris in Family and Consumer Science and served by Mr. Harris (Tech Ed, spouse to Mrs. Harris).
In other district news, Middletown will be receiving a $25K grant to run a program at Bielefield Elementary School, aimed at giving hispanic children after school academic support. The goal of the additional support is to help close the achievement gap when these students take their CMTs. Enza Macri, Assistant Superintendent, told the Board that "we are very proud of this program. We really listened to what parents wanted, and now 90 children are getting academic support four days a week. Parents who don't speak English well enough to help their children with their homework are able to have their children get help after school."
Elementary School to MHS Director of Fine Arts and District Operations, Marco Gaylord, has been named Person of the Year by The Middletown Press. Read the full article here.
Superintendent Pat Charles reported the results of 199 personal interviews she had with a wide range of Middletown parents, teachers, politicians, and students as she gathered information about the nature of the community and organization of Middletown. Charles conducted the interviews to establish a presence in Middletown and to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the Middletown school system. Charles heard repeatedly that the Arts program, improved focus on academics, caring and dedicated staff, and broad course offerings were strengths while Middletown parents and leaders were concerned about the achievement gap, curriculum rigor, library quality, and Special Education. Dr. Charles will use these findings as the BOE reviews and revises its goals, creates budgets, and plans strategically for the future.
In budget news, the BOE is hoping to get funding from FEMA to cover the costs associated with opening the cafeteria as a shelter during last year's hurricane and snowstorm. Budget Chairman Ted Raczka worried out loud about the "Washington D.C. kick the can down the road" approach to budgeting, noting that "sooner or later we are going to have to balance the books, and we will have to bear the burden." Raczka was talking about the fact that the district now has a deficit of more than $1 million dollars for this year, in addition to the 10% budget increase the Superintendent is asking for. "Instead of approaching this as a winners and losers situations, let's consider that all boats rise or all boats sink - cuts should come out of every one's pockets, " Raczka commented. In other words, rather than cutting programs in their entirety, Raczka is advocating cutting some from every part of the budget to spread the pain.
The next BOE meeting is Tuesday, January 22 at 7pm. The board is scheduled to adopt the 2013-2014 School Budget. The meeting will be held in the City Hall Common Council Chambers.
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Superintendent presents 2013-2014 School Budget
- Contractual increases in salaries (asking for 7% increase)
- Increased cost of benefits (assuming a 20% increase in costs)
- A need to purchase critical technology infrastructure & hardware (asking for 23% increase)
- State mandates for the new Common Core State Standards, professional development, assessments, and reform efforts
- Tuition for out of district students (33% increase asked for - covers both special ed services and magnet school participation)
Once the City and the Superintendent agree on what services can be combined, the Superintendent's budget can be finalized. A bottom line budget number is expected at the January BOE meeting.
In the mean time, Dr. Charles has to deal with the current budget deficit for the 2012-2013 budget. The BOE approved immediate cuts in the following areas:
Athletics trainer ($5000)
Activities ($20, 548)
21st Century After School ($15, 000)
Cell phone reduced ($3000)
1 custodian - unfilled position ($40, 000)
All City Arts Show cut back ($2000)
Adult Ed benefits ($40, 000)
BOE salary/benefits reduction ($2000)
Facility use (Hall House) ($9, 621)
Increase cafeteria prices ($15, 000)
Consultant fee reduction ($2, 500)
15% hold on supply funds ($142, 969)
long term sub ($31, 889)
city return of unexpended utility balance ($70, 381)
EAP RFP ($5, 400)
Total - $455,308
These immediate reductions really only cover approximately 1/2 the actual deficit amount. As the school year continues, there are several unknowns that may exaggerate the deficit: winter weather, the out-placement of special ed students, unexpected facilities issues/repairs, state funding reductions, maternity leave, and magnet school participation. Furthermore, approximately 75% of the budget is salaries and benefits, so any significant budgetary savings would have to include cutting teaching positions.
BOE member Sheila Daniels praised the Superintendent, thanking her for a thorough presentation that was eye-opening and daunting: "I think you presented a budget that will move us forward."
BOE Budget Committee member Ed McKeon thanked Dr. Charles for her hard work and analysis for savings, noting that he intended to personally support her budget requests. "We have to work hard to make sure the budget is realistic, but we have been skating on thin ice for 5 years. We have been working on budgets that have sent us backwards, and we can no longer accept budgets that push us backwards. We will continue to see erosion to magnet schools." McKeon went to on say that the "Public has to understand the position that the state put us in - without any proof in the pudding - that this problem is foisted upon BOEs without legislators addressing how to fund education system. The poorest communities have the biggest problems and the wealthiest communities have no problems. It is unacceptable for the governor to say he's cutting education and expecting us to do more. Our schools can't perform at the level expected if resources are taken away."
Budget Chairman Ted Raczka seemed stunned at the proposed budget, and he raised several potential issues of concern:
- How could a new budget get put together if staff contracts had not yet been approved by the Common Council?
- Several of the budget object codes were not clear or transparent for Raczka to understand what the budgeted funds would be used for.
In contrast, BOE Chairman Dr. Gene Nocera commented, "we have a clear understanding of what the district needs, it took a considerable amount of time to present this, and our responsibility to present this in as clear a way as possible. The next 30-60 days are critical to move the district forward."
Besides approving budget reductions, the BOE also acted to approve the 2013-14 School Calendar (yes, February break is included!) and it increased breakfast and lunch prices by $.15 and $.25 respectively. The cafeteria price increase will begin January 2, 2013. For more information, read Dr. Charles' letter to parents here. (click on the Cafeteria Menu Prices Increase as of January 1, 2013 link)
The next regular BOE meeting is Tuesday, January 8, 2013, at 7pm in the Common Council Chambers at City Hall.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Mayor Delivers Budget With Proposed Tax Increase
In his address, Drew said that he inherited a "budget crisis" when he took office, he blamed both increased expenses and the loss of $1.9M in tax revenue paid by Aetna (the grand list actually remained stable compared to last year, due to an increase in other properties). Drew said that his administration had taken a number of steps to reduce expenditures, reducing the potential tax increase from 12% to his proposed 3.8%.
Monday, April 2, 2012
Breaking News: New Mayor's Budget Cuts Education by $3.5 Million
In his budget address, Drew said he was flat-funding the schools, but pointed to money that he hoped the State would provide:
This proposed budget funds education consistent with the 2011-12 fiscal year with the understanding that the State of Connecticut will provide an additional $872,000 directly to the school system. Additionally, the City will provide after school grants funding in the amount of $55,000 that will aid the schools in providing programming for students.
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Board of Education Passes 2012-2013 Budget
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
New Board of Ed Settles In
- Budget Committee: Ted Raczka (chair), Ryan Kennedy, Ed McKeon
- Communication Committee: Ryan Kennedy (chair), Ted Raczka, Mitchell Wynne
- Policy Committee: Sheila Daniels (chair), Bill Grady, Ed McKeon
- Curriculum Committee: Bill Grady (chair), Sheila Daniels, Mitchell Wynne
- Transportation Committee: Bill Grady (chair), Ryan Kennedy, Mitchell Wynne
- Feasibililty Committee: Ed McKeon (chair), Cheryl McClellan
- MFT Negotiaitions: Sheila Daniels, Ava Hart
- TEMS: Cheryl McCellan
- ACES: Ava Hart
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Superintendent to Board of Ed: "Remember the Cliff? We're Here."
Monday, April 11, 2011
BOE Meeting Time and Location Changed
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Board of Education 2010-11 Budget
The specific breakdown for the line item transfers totaling $1,497,466 is also included.
The last Budget Committee minutes available online are from 1/25/10, so there isn't a recent look at how the Budget Committee evaluated the budget...hopefully this changes soon!
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Union President urges citizens to support Mayor's Budget Thursday
Letter to the Eye:
The Common Council is meeting on Thursday, May 13, 2010 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of City Hall to propose and pass their budget for the next fiscal year. I am writing as a City of
My purpose in writing is to urge the people of
466, the union representing the majority of the classified employees at the BOE currently has something like 25 open grievances or labor action with the Board of Education that would be unnecessary in the past as they would have been handled with a phone cal or a meeting. However, the lines of communication have deteriorated so much that it is no longer possible to settle these issues at that low a level. We’ve several instances where grievances have been adjudicated and the BOE has refused to make the ruled adjustments whether monetary or not.
By moving the payroll for the classified employees to the City side of the budget, the BOE would then be treated like every other department in the City. The employees working for that department would be supervised and directed by the department head. The union contract would be applied equally and fairly to all members.
At the meeting for the departments to present their budget requests to the Council, the Superintendent of Schools referenced a state statute that basically limits the funding that a council can appropriate to a board of education so that it cannot be less than what was appropriated in 2009. The Mayor asked for a legal opinion from Shipman & Goodwin on this statute and although they cannot guarantee that there would not be a violation (I’ve never seen a doctor, lawyer or teacher for that matter, guarantee anything) they were confident that there would not be a violation of this statute. I’m attaching the opinion.
I’m being told that the budget to be proposed by the Democratic Council members does not support the Mayor’s budget with the positions being paid out of the City’s side but leaves the positions in the BOE’s budget. I am asking that the Council not do this at this time; once those funds are appropriated to the BOE they are no longer under the control of the Council. I am asking that they wait – let us get the necessary rulings from the State Department of Education and the State Department of Labor that we need to assuage their fears of a penalty. As you can see in the opinion, the determination of having shorted the BOE is made at the END of the fiscal year. They can move the positions to the City side and then change their minds and appropriate the funds to the BOE later.
Please urge the Council to do the right thing.
Thank you,
Linda Salafia
Chapter C President
Local 466
AFSCME
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
An Overdue Tribute
Common Council members Gerry Daley and Phil Pessina called a tribute to former police captain Salvatore "Flash" Faraci, "a long overdue tribute." The Common Council voted, by acclaim to name the road which leads to the police firing range, Captain Salvatore "Flash" Faraci Road.
Faraci designed, planned and managed the building of the police firing range which opened in 1983, and was then, one of two town ranges in Connecticut. The range has now being shared with the FBI.
In other business, the Common Council voted a unanimous "nay" which, if a reverse parliamentary procedure, meant that they endorsed the contract that the Board of Education negotiated with Middletown teachers. The contract institutes a virtual freeze on salaries for teachers in contract year 2011, and an overall increase of $561,000 in salaries and $235,000 in one-time thousand dollar payments for the 420 teachers affected by the contract.
"A hard freeze on wages is a commendable contribution in helping to address the fiscal problems that the city, and in fact, all other governmental institutions will be facing," Daley said.
"$800,000 over a three year contract in our budget is really nothing at all," Council member Thomas Serra added.
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Busted Sewer Budget Means Probable Rate Hikes
In his memo, Russo indicates that because of "(the economy, conservation, lack of usage, wet weather) that total sales are down" to about 6.5% below anticipated revenues. In addition he cites a 7.1% delinquency rate, further anticipated "low sales," anticipated slow collectibles as ongoing issues which will prevent solvency in the near term.
The Sewer Operating Budget is currently out of cash and is owed $1.4 million.
The city is meeting Sewer and Water payroll, but all vendor and supply payments are on hold.
Russo is suggesting a rate increase of $1.45 per thousand cubic feet treated to help make up for the shortfall. This increase would generate $128,000. Another rate increase may be needed in May.
While the lack of revenue is part of the problem, the department has, for at least the past two years, set budget at a higher number than would be available from actual billings. In 2007, the department budgeted $3,730,757 but only billed $3,568,690 resulting in a difference of -$162,000 and an actual shortfall of -$388,446 because of non-collections.
In 2008, the department budgeted $3,960,899 when actual billings were only $3,876,072, a difference of -$84,827 leading to an actual shortfall of -$386,325.
And in 2009, the department budgeted $4,386,272 against anticipated billings of $3,941,888, a difference of -$444,384, and an actual shortfall of -$724,000.
By state statute, the Water Pollution Control Agency (WPCA), the controlling agency for the Water and Sewer Department, is financially autonomous from the city, meaning that once the city has approved a budget, the WPCA is solely responsible for managing expenditures and revenue which applies to that budget.
Among the strategies suggested for making up the shortfall are the rate increase, an immediate loan of half a million dollars from the General Sewer Improvement Fund (which would have to be repaid by fiscal year 2010), an aggressive stance toward collection of unpaid bills (using a collection agency already working for the city), a freeze on filling vacant positions, and cancellation of several sewer projects and the purchase of a new sewer vehicle.
Erlacher will be making a presentation on the Sewer budget crisis at tomorrow's meeting of the WPCA (5:15 PM, Water and Sewer Department headquarters).
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Milardo Reports Budget Carryover for Board of Education
The Board of Education is carrying over almost $1.4 million into this budget year from last year. How? I don’t know?
BOE Administrators received their mileage “reimbursement” checks this week.
Based on current IRS mileage reimbursement rates, which are $.55 (cents) per mile. Here is the Board of Education mileage reimbursement breakdown.
- Superintendent of Schools received $6,200.00. That amounts to; 11,272 miles per year, or 940 miles per month.
- Assistant Superintendent of Schools, two (2) positions, received $4,200.00, each.
That amounts to; 7,637 miles per year, or 637 miles per month, for each Assistant Superintendent.
- Director of Maintenance received $3,900.00. That amounts to; 7,091 miles per year, or 591 miles per month.
- Business Manager (new position, 3 weeks on the job) received $4,000.00. That amounts to; 7,273 miles per year, or 607 miles per month.
Monday, June 8, 2009
School Budget Proposes Elimination of Six Elementary Classes
The meeting will not be held at the High School, as are many meetings which expect to draw large attendence. The Board of Education Budget Meeting will be held at 6 PM at 311 Hunting Hill Avenue at the School Administration Building.
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Council Undoes Budget Veto
The Common Council voted along strictly partly lines Thursday evening 8 to 3 to reinstate the budget they adopted on May 14. Mayor Sebastian Giuliano vetoed the budget, and the Council needed 8 votes to reinstate.
The $129.7 million budget assumes no increase in taxes and limited cuts of programs. The mayor's counter budget of $128.5 million was based on a 1 mil tax increase.
The Democratic council members contended that the city is healthy financially, with new revenue streams, one-time revenue sources and a more-than-solvent general fund. The mayor, and Republican council members noted that none of the revenue sources is guaranteed, and that counting on money not in hand is risky.
Part of the budget is the return of a fireworks celebration, something that was cut out of the mayor's version of the budget, but there were plenty of fireworks during the official meeting with some louder explosions once the meeting was finished (more on that in a separate post).
The debate began when Council member Gerry Daley questioned the basis for the Mayor's veto of the budget. He questioned the Mayor's contention that a nearly $2.6 request to settle retro salary increases based on the police union contract was an "unexpected" expense. He also wondered why the mayor was projecting revenue problems, like the loss of the Aetna facility from the tax rolls, which would not hit the budget until the following fiscal year.
The mayor explained that the $2.6 million would have a draining effect on the general fund, and that his job was to consider not only the current tax year, but the tax burden in successive year as negative impacts hit the budget.
Daly was the first of several Democratic Council members to emphasize that the budget they were proposing was one which avoided a tax increase, and a cut in services.
"These are not ordinary times," Daly said. "And that's why I think taxpayers need a break.'
Umbrage began to be taken in large proportions when Council member David Bauer asked a series of questions, which were required by Roberts Rules of Orders to be "rhetorical." He wanted to know why a compromise budget, offered by the mayor, which would have had no tax increase, and an additional $800,000 in savings was rejected. He also asked if the Council's rejection of a negotiated "no layoff" clause with unions meant that the Council was expecting layoffs to be part of the budget solution.
In a short diversion where the rules of order were discussed heatedly, charges were traded.
"This is not a dictatorship," Daley said of one of Giuliano's rulings as chairman of the meeting. "This is a democracy."
Answering Bauer, Majority leader Tom Serra charged that Bauer was using scare tactics.
"You did the same thing last year," Serra scolded. "Layoffs, layoffs, layoffs. This budget is going to work and there will be no layoffs."
All the Democratic members painted a rosy picture of the the City of Middletown's financial health. They pointed to revenue from the sale of Cucia Park, and to expected tax revenue on the opening of the Kleen Energy plant. Both Serra and Daley mentioned that they expected no problems with bond ratings. Daley indicated that even after expenditures the general fund would be at a level higher than five years ago.
Council member Vinnie Loffredo chastised the mayor for the first budget sent their way. He noted that union concessions were tied to specific cuts.
"That was totally unacceptable," Loffredo said. "How were we going to go through that (budget) process under those pressures. Those threats. Everyone of the concessions was linked together. It was a house of cards."
Loffredo conceded that the mayor and the unions later unlinked the concessions to specific budget cuts.
Bauer wouldn't let a vote be called without a final warning.
"This budget raises the specter of layoffs," he said. "The numbers don't lie. Last year this Council cut by one third what the mayor had proposed as projected spending. Then the council ended up spending every cent of the third they had cut, and beyond."
After a final rebuttal by Gerry Daley, a vote was called, the veto was rejected, and the Council voted to adjorn.
Common Council To Vote on Vetoed Budget
While both sides met to discuss the budget, the resolution reads as follows:
In Accordance with Chapter VI, Finance and Taxation, Section 1 of the
City Charter, readopting all items that were vetoed in the 2009 – 2010
budget and that said budget be effective as adopted by the Common
Council at their meeting of May 14, 2009 at 7 p.m
In an email to a Middletown Eye contributor Mayor Sebastian Giuliano writes:
" Carl Erlacher, Diana Doyle, Tima Bomes, Debra Milardo, Geen and I came up with a proposed compromise that would ahve saved as much as $800K by keeping the union concessions in play, making some cuts (while preserving the great majority of their pet project spending) and using considerably less of the Cucia Park projected proceeds. Word is that the majority caucus is just going to override my veto and keep their own budget."
The Citizens Advisory Committee met Wednesday evening, and as a result of stimulus dollars provided to the city, restored funding to several organizations who had seen their annual contributions cut drastically or completely. If the Common Council takes the advice of the Citizens Advisory Committee, the St. Vincent DePaul Amazing Grace Pantry, which had been set to receive no funding, will now receive $6000 for the Pantry, and $10000 to perform a relocation study for their soup kitchen. In addition the Chamber of Commerce will move from $8000 to $19,0000.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Mayor's Veto May Result In Compromise

As reported earlier today, Mayor Sebastian Giuliano vetoed the city budget proposed by the Common Council last Thursday.
In a written statement accompanying his formal veto, the Mayor listed five specific reasons for rejecting the budget. He indicated the Council might be unaware of a $2.6 million appropriation from the reserve fund to adjust Police salary and overtime as a result of collective bargaining agreements. He also noted a $1.8 million dollar decrease in revenue in the next fiscal year due as Aetna prepares to move its operation out of Middletown. In addition, the mayor points to nearly $100,000 in revenue overprojections he feels the Council has made in real estate tax revenues and licenses. The mayor also feels that the projected sum of $1.5 million dollars for the sale of Cucia Park to the Army is misguided. Finally, he feels that projected savings from "voluntary concessions" is unrealistic after the Council rejected the union concession package.
"I cut spending as far as I could cut," the mayor said in an interview this afternoon. "I negotiated a million dollars in concessions from city unions, and I could only get the budget down to a 1 mil tax increase. The Common Council added all the cut spending back. They spurned the $1 million in concessions, and they proposed no tax increase. Where's the money coming from."
After hearing criticism from his Democratic opponent in the mayoral race Giuliano indicated that the tax increase of 1 mil is a minimal increase.
"It's an average of $160 a year per household," the mayor claimed. "That's four dollars a week for the average taxpayer. You'd give up a cup of coffee and a donut a week. You don't want to give that up, and in return you'll choose financial chaos in the next fiscal year."
Democratic majority leader Thomas Serra, who had only just reviewed the mayor's veto and counterproposal, was cautious in his assessment.
"We'll caucus and discuss it," Serra said. "It looks like he's proposing a 25.5 mil rate, which is no increase. If that's the case, it will be how comfortable the caucus is with the lateral changes. We thought the mayor's cuts were completely responsible, but we were worried about the disparity in furlough days in the different unions, and the loss of funding for Police officers. We believe the citizens of Middletown cannot bear an increase in tax payments."
The mayor also indicated there might be room to compromise.
"If we all sit down we might be able to find a way out of it," the mayor said. "But if you say you're fiscally responsible you can't use a one-time cash receipt to help solve a problem that will come back year after year. You know who deals with it in the end - the taxpayer."
This is the second time the mayor has vetoed a budget. Last year he objected to the use of projected funds from the sale of the Remington Rand building. That sale did not occur as planned.
The Common Council can override the mayor's veto with a two-thirds vote of Council members. The Council has 10 days to consider the veto and call a meeeting to adjust the budget. The Democratic members plan to caucus immediately to consider the veto and possible adjustments to the budget.




