On Tuesday, the residents and taxpayers of Middletown will
have the opportunity to comment on the school budget proposed by school
superintendent Pat Charles.
As a father of two boys in a city elementary school, and as
a member of the Board of Education, I urge all residents to support full
funding of the budget as requested, and here are five reasons why.
1.
The Board
of Education Budget is more open and transparent than ever before. In the past, the public, and the Common
Council have complained that budgeting and spending at the Board of Education
was cloaked in secrecy. This year, under
Superintendent Pat Charles, the Council received the budget request earlier
than they ever have. They have had the
chance to examine it and question expenditures.
They mayor, and his financial advisers, have been part of budget
development from the beginning, and all have been invited to attend Budget
Committee and Board meetings to join in financial discussions, though few
have.
In the past five years the Common Council
has granted only minimal increases to the Board of Ed. These minimal increases have meant that the
BOE has not been able to reasonably keep up with inflation, contract obligations,
loss of state and federal grants and state mandates (it must be noted that
Middletown teachers, have, during that period, given up expected raises). This also means that after five years, we are
trying to dig out of a deep hole.
The Board asked Superintendent Charles to
develop a budget that would allow us to deliver all services to students that
we now deliver, with no loss of teachers, no increase in class size, and with a
modest increase for teacher development.
That realistic budget was delivered and it would have meant an 11.6%
increase (an increase of
$8,413,411 from 2012-2013.) As a
board we knew that it was too large an increase for a single year, so we asked
the Superintendent to create a budget that would serve students at a very basic
level. That budget is the one before
you, asking for a 7.1% increase ($77,722,558 total, $5,172,558 increase).
Even with that increase we will have fewer
teachers (between 7-11 fewer positions), larger class sizes, less classroom
help for students with special needs, fewer supplies, fewer computers, and no
meaningful teacher development. The
mayor has suggested that further cuts are necessary, we will be cutting deep
into the flesh of the educational needs of our kids. With those kind of cuts we would need to
eliminate around 20 teaching positions, delay purchase of computers, cut
administrative support, reduce supplies and eliminate some extra-curricular
activities.
2.
Unfunded
state mandates are crippling our ability to teach. Forget about whether you agree with increased
testing, new teacher evaluations or common core instruction. These state and federal mandates require that
our schools teach, test and evaluate in prescribed methods, using prescribed
materials and personnel. All of this
costs hundreds of thousands of dollars.
And the state and federal government only provides a fraction of what it
costs. There has been an uptick in
mandates in the past few years, but no uptick in money to pay for them. Every new mandate erodes the budget for everyday
instruction.
3.
Middletown
is not spending as much on education as you think, when compared to cities like
ours. It’s too simplistic to say
that the cost-per-pupil somehow dictates what the outcome, or success of a
student should be. $13,000 spent in
Glastonbury is not the same as $13,000 spent in Middletown. Here the issues of poverty and
school-preparedness are major challenges, and the need and costs of
intervention are so much higher than they are in wealthy towns. On lists which compares schools against
schools with the same demographics as Middletown, we are only in the middle of
the list for per pupil spending, and that accounts for debt service the city
pays.
4.
Magnet
schools and Charter Schools are draining revenue from our budget. The state, in its wisdom, has created incentives
for the creation of Magnet and Charter Schools to attempt to solve the problems
of fair access to education, a wide achievement gap, and inequity in big-city
schools. Despite the fact that these
schools have not begun to solve these problems they are well-funded by the
state. They recruit some of our best
students away with the lure of better equipped, modern schools with low
teacher-to-student ratios. But our
school district has to pay a large portion of the tuition for students who
choose to attend these schools. Last
year Middletown paid in excess of $370,000 in tuition, but our savings are
negligible. The eighty students who
attend these schools come from throughout our school system, which doesn’t
allow us to downsize in any meaningful way.
We still have the same number of schools buildings, classes, supplies
and teachers. So the tuition we pay out
is a net loss for our district.
5.
Do it for
yourself. If you have children in
the school system, it makes perfect sense to demand the funding needed for the
best education. If you don’t have
children in school, you might think otherwise, but you’re fooling
yourself. I’ve always said that good
schools are the best economic development tool any city can have. People and companies will only move to town,
will only stay in town, if the schools can serve their children well. Any real estate agent will tell you that the
value of your home is directly tied to the quality of schools in your
town. If we let our school district deteriorate,
we do it at the risk of losing value on our own property. If you think you’ll ever want to sell your
house, you’ll want to be able to say that Middletown Schools are highly ranked,
because it will make thousands of dollars difference in the price.
We
have great schools, great teachers and high-achieving students, working hard,
but without the resources they should have.
By underfunding our schools we put at risk our ability to maintain high
standards, worse still, we risk making the progress we need to make.
I
urge you to take time to attend the public hearing on the budget in the Common
Council chambers on Tuesday, and to make your opinion known.
13 comments:
Disagree that this is a transparent budget. Where are the numbers of employees? And the descriptions of the programs and associated costs like new teacher evaluation system? In prior years there was a booklet and description on the boe website. That kind of info is no where to be found.
The BOE did not even approve a budget until March and were unaware they even had a policy that required them to approve it and submit it to the city in January. So it did not get done sooner this year contrary to these claims.
Its hard to support such an increase in superintendent salary. Her salary is out of line - where was McKeon when her salary was being negotiated?
The pat on the back is not warranted and neither is the budget.
The kids that go to the magnet and charter schools are leaving Middletown schools for a reason. What's the high priced superintendent and the do nothing BOE doing to retain these students?
Stop complaining and do something!
Dr. Charles inherited a $1.5 million deficit in the 2012-13 budget that she did not create. She successfully erased the deficit, and put into effect many cost savings strategies for this year and future budgets. For that reason alone, she is worth the price.
Furthermore, if you've seen a BOE budget presentation recently (and I've personally seen it more than once), you would have also seen the Mayor, the BOE Chairman and the Superintendent all sitting next to each other at the same table, using nice language, and talking about Middletown's educational priorities. Not "my" or "our" priorities, but Middletown's. The complete change in tone and non-verbal body language between those three entities is also worth the price of the Superintendent's salary.
Finally, the BOE and the Superintendent can only do so much with so little. Teachers can't pull text books and copy paper and field trips out of thin air, and that's what our budget has been reduced to. Spend even 5 minutes talking to a Middletown Elementary School principal about their supply budget, and you'll understand the draw to magnet schools. We as a town have to spend the money first, and then the students will stop leaving. It's doesn't work the other way around.
Don't believe me? Come to a BOE meeting and see for yourself...the next one is May 14th at 7pm at City Hall.
I.5 million dollar deficit in the current budget?? Really what was done, and it's admirable and necessary, was to bring the spending down to the budgeted amount. Previously BOE administrations spent money without regard to the amount budgeted or in other words spent more money than was allocated to them. There was no deficit in the 2012-2013 budget; the BOE would have liked and probably needed 1.5 million dollars more but since it was available to them; they correctly reduced spending to what they received from the City and taxpayers. There is a system for the BOE or any department of the City to request more funding if they find that they have unexpected or exceptional expenses: they can request an appropriation (more money) from the Council. You don't just spend the money anyway (since the check won't bounce cause there's a general fund balance to cover it) like the previous superintendent did.
Funny how those against the BOE Budget remain anonymous.
Signing your comment with a first name and initial is practically the same as using anonymous in my opinion.
Who I may be shouldn't affect how you think of that.
By anyone's reasoning regarding the use of "anonymous", we should all be voting in plain sight of the public for all to know for who we vote. But we all cast our votes anonymously, don't we? There can be many reasons why a person wishes to remain anonymous and they are as valid as those who wish to announce their opinions gladly without the veil of anonymity.
Anon on 4/29/13 at 12:11 am - I'm sorry, but your characterization of "bringing spending down to the budgeted amount" isn't completely correct. The district can budget for students attending TEMS, but it can't predict how many students will decide to go to other magnet schools. Yet, it is still responsible for that payment, and you can't call that "spending money without regard to the amount budgeted."
There absolutely was a deficit: check the long-term substitute expenses and magnet school tuition expenses as primary examples of expenses the district had to pay outside the "budgeted amount."
The budget is amount of money that the BOE can legally spend. The city appropriates a certain amount of money to the Board who spend it as they deem necessary, the budget shows how they plan to do that. Granted most line items need to be estimated based on past history or experience. Some line items are more fixed based on already negotiated contracts. The tuition line is one of those lines that is subject to change. However, the BOE cannot spend more than they are appropriated. If they fall short, the process is to approach the Common Council and ask for another appropriation. They are not supposed to just spend the money anyway which us what happened under Dr. Frechettes watch.
Random:
There are some legitimate reasons for people to remain anonymous in their comments. But they are rare.
In the web world, anonymity affords the cowardly the ability to spew hit-and-run faulty "arguments" without taking the responsibility to stand up for them.
Facts are only facts if they can be verified. Anonymity makes that impossible.
As you know, the Eye no longer prints mean-spirited insults, so the trolls have fled elsewhere.
Can't say that I agree that anonyminity means that you check the facts. Facts are facts and if true are true no matter who speaks or write them.
The Eye should just not post anon comments since "mean" is subjective. So Ed for Mayor?
Anon 12:28: Facts are facts. Lies are lies. Rumors are rumors. If you put your name to it, someone can call you on a fact that ain't. If your anonymous, then you're hiding something. And...
Anon 1:11: ...Of course it's subjective. That's what the role of editor is.
Post a Comment