Last week Mayor Sebastian Giuliano appeared on WNPR and, with the mayors of West Hartford and East Hartford, discussed the effects of the economy on their respective cities. It was, and is, worthwhile listening.
The subject of snow removal came up. The mayors discussed innovative methods of snow removal, including abandoning sand because of the necessitated Springtime cleanup, and an expensive method Giuliano suggested in which snow is plowed into melting units.
Giuliano also mentioned the snow berm on Main Street. He claimed that the pile in the middle of our wide Main Street must be removed days after the storm through a process which entails middle-of-night scooping and transporting the snow, at a great cost to the city in overtime pay. I would add that the early-morning removal is excessively noisy for downtown neighbors, what with trucks scooping, scraping and beeping their infernal safety reverse-alert alarms.
The excess snow is trucked to a parking lot near the Cochinchaug River where its diluting and polluting effect while melting, has harmed the fragile ecosystem of the river.
While walking down Main Street today, after a snowfall, I got to thinking that there has to be a better way, and one that does not include buying huge melters.
Plow the snow to the curb - As far as I can tell, when plows travel down city streets, they push the snow toward the curbs on either side of the street. This causes large snowpiles on the treelawn on both sides of the street. On my street, Pearl Street, where tree lawns are narrow, the fast-moving plows deposit much of the street snow on my sidewalk. On Main Street, the plows push the snow to the middle of the street. And that's a puzzle. Why not push all the show toward the curbs. All the sidewalks are very wide. Merchants would be required to dig pathways for their clients. But it would save the city the cost of midnight snow transport.
Leave the berm - the city could continue to plow the snow to the middle of the street, but just leave the snow berm where it is. Some mid-block passages would have to be plowed for pedestrian passage, but the berm actually serves some safety purposes. It prevents the mid-street u-turn and left turn that is banned, but still frequently practiced, on Main Street. It restricts jaywalking. And it gives residents the opportunity to experience Main Street as a boulevard in which the snow acts as stand-in for a greenway, or neutral ground, or allows us to imagine what having a trolley route on Main Street might mean. At the very least it serves to slow traffic which would have narrower lanes, and constricted sight lines. We'd concede that in a very snowy winter, an occasional berm removal might be necessary, though not at the close of every storm.
Remove the snow during regular working hours - while this would be the least desirable alternative, the minor and temporary inconvenience to drivers would offset the large costs to the city.
In all cases, the decision to do other than what is currently done, is the mayors by authority of his office as defined in the City Charter ("the Mayor shall be directly responsible for the administration of all Departments, Agencies and Offices, in charge of persons or Boards appointed by the Mayor and shall supervise and direct the same.")
And in these fiscally-challeging times, it would seem that significant cost savings would trump minor inconveniences, and that thinking outside-of-the-box (or as in this case, the berm), would be appropriate.
