Well, well,
well! Middletown Mayor Daniel T. Drew
has now become the most underhanded, untrustworthy, Mayor of all time in our
City! He has now decided that he does
not need the Common Council to approve tax abatements for businesses.
Reportedly, Mayor Drew gave one or more businesses, between 2015-16, a reduction in their property taxes of $150,000. That’s right, $150,000! How are your property taxes? Seen any reductions in them lately? We should all go see Danny and ask him for one. Gee, I wonder how much these companies donated to his campaign funds?
Reportedly, Mayor Drew gave one or more businesses, between 2015-16, a reduction in their property taxes of $150,000. That’s right, $150,000! How are your property taxes? Seen any reductions in them lately? We should all go see Danny and ask him for one. Gee, I wonder how much these companies donated to his campaign funds?
Whether it’s
called a “deferral” or an “abatement”, this issue should have gone before the
Common Council members for approval. The
Mayor does not have the unilateral authority to approve a tax abatement…. for
anyone. He has violated the City Charter
and the public’s trust.
As those who
have college student loans know, a deferral means what you currently owe is
placed on hold until the individual finish studies. Once you’re finished your courses, payback of
all money owed begins again.
Abatement, means a certain amount, let’s say $150,000 is forgiven. You don’t pay it back. These above-mentioned companies don’t have to
pay tax money back. Therefore, it’s an
abatement, not a deferral. No matter how
you cut it, the Mayor violated policy and City law.
Supposedly,
Mayor Dan received a legal opinion from the City Office of General Counsel
giving him the authority to do so.
Whomever in legal gave him that opinion should be under investigation,
as should the Mayor. Impeachment and
termination should be on the table as well.
How could
this have been kept a “secret” for all this time? If this was on the up and up, the Mayor would
have been tooting his horn about it.
Shame on the Democrats and Republicans of the Common Council if they
knew about this and said nothing!
Questions. Why
this/these businesses only? Why this
certain amount? Why didn’t the abatement
have to go through any other Commission, Committees, or Council meeting? Why was the issue hidden from the public?
On to different topics.
The Mattabasett/Middletown sewer project is underfunded…...again! Town voters approved the first bond for this project a couple or more years ago. For those who may not remember, Middletown’s’ Sewer Treatment Plant is obsolete. We voted to pump sewage from Middletown to Cromwell’s Mattabasett sewer treatment plant. After the installation of some of the pipe work was done, Director Guy Russo, who retired this past year, ran out of funding for the project so another $15 million dollars was approved by town voters to complete the work. He assured the Common Council members at that time, $15 million would be more than enough to finish everything, including the pump station. Well, the money is gone, and the pump station cannot be completed. I guess they’ll ask us for more funding AGAIN!
I hear the State of Connecticut will be blamed for the additional
cost because they are demanding different mechanical and technical equipment
and the like. It’s not the States
fault. You don’t ask for bond money
without having all your permits, architectural drawings, designs, etc. approved
by the State before you begin any portion of the project. It is the City’s fault! Taxpayers’ will be on the hook, again!
There is one exception to the rule - the $35 million bond
approved for Park improvement by the voters which had no plan at all. It’s a $35 million blank check to do what the
Public Works Department wants to do with it.
A Park/Public Works Committee was put in place after the bond was
approved to decide what improvements will be made. I have a suggestion. Why not take money needed to complete the
Sewer project from the Park bond? The
Park bond funding was predicated on building artificial athletic fields. That fell through, so natural turf fields are
being constructed. There is a vast
difference between the two. There should
be a surplus of millions of dollars in the Park bond due to natural field
construction.
We keep on hearing about “transparency in government” by our
local officials. Yet few question the
illegal activities of Mayor Drew. It’s
about time both Democrats and Republican Common Council members question this
Mayor on his inappropriate behaviors. If
they don’t, then they are just as complicit!
Wow John. Thank you for bringing these issues to the surface.
ReplyDeleteHow can these problems be made more public for awareness amongst the voting population? Things like this I feel belong on the night time news and in headlines.
This blog is great and is an excellent outlet for discussions like this but very few of the city population frequent this site unfortunately.
I would like to see council members address these claims in the comments section here. Will you bring this up for discussion at your next council meeting? Will you demand an investigation? I suggest Danny boy make the coffers whole personally if he broke these laws.
The sewer project is a sad but not too surprising outcome either. City government operates very different from the private sector it seems since they know they can force taxes on the tax base at will.
The Common Council members now know about these issues, and probably did before I heard about them. It's up the them to perform their due diligence for the public who placed them in their positions to PROTECT THE PUBLIC!
ReplyDeleteAs I stated, if they do not, then they are complicit!
John Milardo’s suggestion to redirect the parks bonding money to the sewer pumping station is brilliant! And because the decommissioning of the old sewage treatment facility on River Road will create the conditions for a riverfront park (see the plan created by the Project for Public Spaces), the redirection of the money is not inappropriate.
ReplyDeleteI would love to see a council member respond to this openly in the forum.
ReplyDelete