Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Council to Consider Coginchaug Channel Clearing

The Finance and Government Operations Commission will discuss a proposed Resolution that city workers unilaterally open the channel in the Coginchaug which was blocked by a landslide below Charton Apartments on March 29th.

The landslide has caused a significant blockage of the Coginchaug, causing the river to rise by as much as 4 feet in Veterans Park, and threatening the health of hundreds of riverbank trees. The draft resolution cites the threat to the trees on the river bank, but more specifically notes the very real possibility of flooding at Palmer Field and the Middletown Sports Hall of Fame.

Previous plans to correct the problem would have used Federal and State funding to clear the obstruction and recreate the channel. However, the Natural Resource Conservation District, part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, refused to fund any work on the channel unless work was done on the upper slope to ensure that there would not be a repeat landslide.

The draft resolution provides extensive background to the "bureaucratic entanglement" which is preventing any work. "There is general agreement that the upper slope fix will be in excess of $75,000 for design and $750,000 for construction." Ted Charton, owner and manager of the Charton Apartments, insists that the work he has already done on the slope will prevent any future landslides, but he has not hired an engineer to evaluate this. Neither Charton, nor the city, state, or federal government are willing to fund work on the slope. Thus, the channel remains untouched since the slide.

When the city proposed to the DEP that city workers create a diversion channel through the landslide debris without fixing the slope, Amey Marella, Commissioner of the DEP, responded that the City needs all relevant state and federal permits, and must address the upper slope in conjunction with any work. However, further discussion with her Chief of Staff has led the city to believe that a river diversion plan could be authorized if a plan is prepared by a geotechnical engineer.

The proposed Council Resolution would authorize $15,000 to retain this professional engineer.

Perhaps the most controversial part of the resolution is the proposal that, "if the State and Federal authorizations are not secured in a timely manner, the Common Council authorizes the Mayor, pursuant to under [sic] CGS 7-146, to enter into the channel to remove the debris and release the backed up water, with or without State and Federal authorizations."

Charton told me that he had been prepared to tell his contractor to do just that, but he could not do it without the necessary permits. In fact, on June 28th, Charton was given a cease and desist order in which he was ordered to "Halt all regulated activity immediately and secure necessary permits to remove the obstruction from the channel and stop the upstream flooding."

7 comments:

  1. Why does Finance get to make a decision that might contravene a Wetlands Agency decision?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why can't DEP require Mr. Chartron to repair the landslide that caused this diversion?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why did the city allow him to build as they did in the first place. Shame on city hall for allowing that addition. It never should have been approved to begin with. The slope was in no shape to withstand heavy rain after the addition. The city needs an expert to determine what should be done there, and Charton should pay for it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The city wetland commission can order him to fix it,if they had the intestinal fortitude bu tthey don't neither does staff

    What fool thinks the city should move without the necessary permits which take 9 - 18 months to process is mind numbing the Army Corp and DEP have put the city on notice of what is required to remove the material. More legal fees coming down the road

    ReplyDelete
  5. ....and what incentive does Mr. Charton have to spend a dime to correct the mess? absolutely none. He got what he wanted--his apts. are full. And he is content to let the City clean up after him! Nothing changes w/ this guy!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why has the EPA and Army Corp engineers done nothing when the city has asked for help. That is what I want know.

    Stop blaming City Hall for something they can't do without the EPA or Army Corps go ahead.

    ReplyDelete
  7. People who don't know all of what they are talking about shouldn't comment. That property is not just property belonging to Charton. It also is part of the library and houses behind his property as well as the city property down below. How is it all his fault? He only tries to do what's right and better is properties. All agencies should be helping and if it happened to you, would it be any different? How would you think then? Mr. Charton has spent loads of money already on this property trying to fix the problems he can fix. And, please don't talk about others like you know what you are talking about. If you have something against Mr. Charton, keep it to yourself. What goes around, comes around...watch yourself!

    ReplyDelete

Unsigned comments will rarely be published. If you want your comment to be published, make it clear who you are. Use your real name, don't leave us guessing your identity.