Budget Will Cut 13 Elementary School Teachers
Faced with the task of approving next year's school budget before the Mayor's deadline, the Board of Education held a public hearing and a vigorous debate on Tuesday night. Ultimately, they voted along party lines for a 2% increase over the current year's budget. Due to contracted increases, this means a $2.5 million cut in services.
The budget on the table was the one drafted by Superintendent Michael Frechette on February 17th. At Tuesday's meeting, the Republicans made an effort to change the direction of the budget from one which cuts 13 elementary teachers to one that would spread the pain in other ways.
They were unsuccessful, with a few small exceptions.
The Republicans — Sheila Daniels, Corinne Gill and Ryan Kennedy — came up with a list of cuts and put-backs that totaled up to the same 2% increase as the Superintendent's budget, but showed different priorities. Line by line, they tried to convince their colleagues that there were savings to be found
•in transportation costs by swapping kids at Moody, Macdonough and Spencer;
•in cutting stipends for assistant coaches in high school sports;
•in cutting travel, association dues, and miscellaneous other small costs.
On one item, they were successful: the proposal to lower thermostats in the winter and raise them in the summer (by 2 degrees) was accepted and is projected to save the district about $50,000 in fuel costs.
The Republicans wanted several items restored to the budget as well, such as the pre-K to 12th grade supervisors (3.5 jobs) who were to play a role in implementing the just-approved District Improvement Plan.
Throughout the meeting, the Republicans waved the banner of keeping class sizes small in the elementary level. They were particularly irked that athletics were not cut at all in the Superintendent's budget, while teaching positions were eliminated. This sentiment was shared by Democrat Renee Johnson-Thornton, who noted that volunteers might be sought to help with some of the sports programs and that even teachers themselves might volunteer, a suggestion that was shot down as being a violation of the union contract.
Although the majority denied most of the requests to restore items to the budget, there were two additions. The Board agreed to restore the funding for the 21st Century program. This afterschool program is a joint effort between the schools, Wesleyan University, the YMCA and Oddfellows to help the neediest kids at Bielefield, Snow and Macdonough schools. It was recognized that the $30,000 line item is only a portion of the actual costs of running the program. This cost was offset by the savings in fuel costs.
The Board also put about $20,000 back into the salary line item to make the budget balance at a 2% increase.
Some hightlights of the school budget:
•cuts 13 teaching positions at the elementary level
•replaces 11 retiring teachers with (presumably) lower cost, less experienced teachers
•trades 3.5 supervisors who serve Pre-K through 12th grade for 2 instructional support teachers in the middle schools.
•eliminates one PROBE teacher and one assistant superintendent, and a few other non-classroom positions.
•trims the edges off various items such as instructional supplies
•bets on lower prices for heating oil and replacement maintenance costs.
Although the budget doesn't actually crunch the numbers, it looks to me like the elementary class size will rise from an average of 18.23 students per class to 20.07 students per class (that's based on this February's enrollment - 2589 students in 142 classrooms). Note that the current class sizes actually range from 13 to 25 children per room. That's just for K through 5, and does not count the preschool classrooms, which are much smaller.
One topic that recieved a lot of attention at the meeting was the PROBE program for gifted and talented 4th and 5th graders. In this budget, the program will be cut in half, leaving only one teaching position. Since both of the two long-time PROBE teachers have announced their retirement, Jay Keiser proposed that this was a good time to review the program and perhaps alter the way it is structured. Jim Gaudreau, the principal of Snow School, also suggested that even though they didn't want to see it cut, the principals would like the system to consider changing the program to reach more students.
The final vote on the 2% budget was five in favor (Ted Raczka, Jay Keiser, Bill Boyd, Renee Johnson-Thornton and Sally Boske) and three against (Corinne Gill, Sheila Daniels and Ryan Kennedy.) Although she did cast a vote, throughout the meeting member Sally Boske maintained that she would not be voting on the budget. Her position was that it would be better to wait to approve a budget, since the schools will know by mid-March which teachers will be accepting an early retirement package. (my apologies for an earlier version of this report which listed her as abstaining)
Now the Mayor and the Common Council will consider the amount of funding that the school district has requested. The 2009-2010 budget is not final until it receives Common Council approval later this Spring.
It pains me to say this, but I have to agree with the Republicans on this one. It is absolutely ridiculous that they can't find a way to keep these 13 teachers employed. Why can't they agree that in this particular year a 2% increase is out of the question! My God, talk about living in ivory towers. Nice touch - rethinking the gifted and talented program. Just herd them all together. Shining examples be damned.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the update. I personally would vote for no PROBE..spend those dollars on more experienced gifted teachers who can creatively teach to students on all levels.
ReplyDeletePROBE is a program designed for the top 10% of the students based on their CMT scores, Naglieri scores, and teacher recommendations. It is a program that enriches a curricula that is increasingly geared for "the test" in order to engage a group of outstanding students in learning. PROBE is a saving grace for many students who are bored to tears and held back by the requirements of NCLB and other educational mandates.
ReplyDeletePROBE is how ALL classrooms should be run. However, the unfortunate reality is in order to glean any monies for programs, teaching to "the test" is all the system can do. Eliminating PROBE would be tantamount to eliminating speech therapy or occupational therapy for a child with different "special needs". (YES a gifted child IS a special needs student as per the U.S. Department of Education.)
If the need for "belt tightening" is required WHY remove any program that benefits any student??? WHY eliminate teaching positions that benefit any student??? WHY are we looking at removing things that will aid in the education of children who will hold our well being in their hands in a few scant years???
I choose to forgo a new car and continue to drive my 13 year old clunker in order to ensure my children have shelter, clothing and food. I choose to put my children and their needs first. WHY should a school district that is funded by MY taxes choose to do any different?? You can be assured that there will not be a line item to reduce the salary of administrators in order to balance the budget, or even a line item requiring the Superintendents office to supply themselves with paper and toner out of their own pockets.
Why should my child, gifted, "normal", or otherwise be hindered in receiving the best education Middletown can muster, with my tax dollars, simply because people have lost sight of the true intention of a SCHOOL BUDGET. School Budget, intended for children and their continuing education, not school depriving, not education hindering, and certainly NOT program eliminating.
Regardless of the political, socioeconomic, or familial stance of the BOE members they all need to remember what is most important in this decision, The Children.
I attended that farce of a meeting and it sickened me to hear the board members banter back and forth, line by line as they voted by party affiliation rather than by what is best for the students in the district. The fact that this budget was prepared in February and a last minute, “emergency” meeting was called on the eve of it being presented to the Mayor reinforces the notion that the BOE does not take the public seriously or into the equation at all. These tough times call for tough measures and sacrifices from everyone to insure that our children receive the best education possible and not slighted due to political posturing. To hear those on the board vote against restoring 13 teachers and the other critical measures to education in favor of keeping administrative pork in the budget proves that once again the BOE is failing in the primary responsibility to the Middletown parent and taxpayer. I encourage everyone who has a child in the district or pays taxes here to come to a BOE meeting and voice your concerns, whatever they may be during the 5 minutes that the BOE allows the public to talk. We need to show them all, Democrat and Republican that this is unacceptable and we need to be part of the process at the onset, not at the tail end.
ReplyDelete